{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f812573a947a",
  "docSlug": "eea7524c557036f4",
  "documentTitle": "2020 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2020",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Air Street Capital",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 138,
  "pageCount": 177,
  "prevPage": 137,
  "nextPage": 139,
  "slideType": "case_study",
  "function": "illustrate_case",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a specific case (Ed Bridges vs South Wales Police) to illustrate the shift toward proactive regulation of AI technologies.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "photo"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f812573a947a/138",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f812573a947a",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f812573a947a.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f812573a947a#slide-138",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "This means that action on bias cannot be legally deferred until the tech has matured.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-47c5-73ac-aa6d-cf1fd400737b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.225,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.564,
        "y": 0.349
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": null,
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "photo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b3961288-025f-4698-b150-663fa1149065",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.52,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Shifting legal framework for law enforcement. The High Court in the UK became the first court to review a police force's use of automated facial recognition technology. Although judges ruled against the claimant, they also established an important new duty for the police to make sure that discrimination is proactively “eliminated”. The emphasis is on regulating technology now rather than after harm has occurred. A spokesperson for South Wales police made it clear that the force plans to continue to use facial recognition technology.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2419157b-ebcc-4295-af8c-2c3fab701c31",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Facial recognition: A new legal precedent in the UK emphasizes that facial recognition tools cannot \"move fast and break things\"",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "31c06cb0-5220-4879-8bdd-1cb19abf7835",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Metaphor & Analogy",
      "slug": "metaphor-analogy",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0fd5-7148-8ed0-3d30f02a937e",
      "evidence": "'Move fast and break things' analogy critiqued.",
      "confidence": 75
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 170,
      "from": 130,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-f2fc34acb214",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Politics section unpacks ethical, geopolitical and labor consequences.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 170,
      "from": 130,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e35-01ef1d0aee03",
      "arcName": "The Mountain",
      "arcSlug": "mountain",
      "beatName": "Climax",
      "beatSlug": "mountain-climax",
      "evidence": "Politics section dramatises facial recognition, military, US/China conflicts.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 40,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 140,
      "from": 131,
      "name": "Ripple Effect",
      "slug": "26-ripple-effect",
      "bestFor": "Change management, scaling initiatives, demonstrating broad value",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3d-270e46b4c916",
      "evidence": "Risks -> wrongful arrests -> Facebook $650M -> Clearview -> UK ruling -> WA law -> China lawsuit.",
      "position": 16,
      "objective": "Trace ripple of facial recognition harms from arrests to lawsuits to legislation",
      "structure": "Individual Impact -> Team Impact -> Organizational Impact -> Market/Industry Impact",
      "confidence": 70,
      "description": "Show how impact spreads from individual to team to organization to market"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}