{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f6fdd8f57895",
  "docSlug": "3a892393f72c1ff5",
  "documentTitle": "2019 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2019",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Nathan Benaich and Ian Hogarth",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 129,
  "pageCount": 136,
  "prevPage": 128,
  "nextPage": 130,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 2,
  "notes": "Data source: The Allen Institute. Includes trend projections.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "action_title",
    "paragraph",
    "line_chart"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f6fdd8f57895/129",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f6fdd8f57895",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f6fdd8f57895.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f6fdd8f57895#slide-129",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "China already publishes a larger quantity of ML research than the US. A recent analysis by The Allen Institute suggests China is also rapidly closing the gap in terms of quality.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-41ac-7180-a80a-cd991f2a156d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Share of top 50% of AI Papers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "line",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "05603d2d-fd22-4e85-8552-b8f14c87bbe1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.52,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Share of top 1% of AI Papers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "line",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f69fc44b-7cf5-43b2-a6aa-8eadbe6615d0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Market Share of AI Papers",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-41ac-7180-a80a-d113acd71732",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "China already publishes a larger quantity of ML research than the US. A recent analysis by The Allen Institute suggests China is also rapidly closing the gap in terms of quality.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "84c7755b-508f-494a-807f-1e36784fcc56",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "China is publishing more high impact machine learning academic research",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f3d75bbe-cb79-4bef-b01c-0df955b7f46f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 129,
      "from": 93,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-d256aedd9e9f",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Politics and China sections interpret what the technical facts mean geopolitically.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 129,
      "from": 93,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-e3d02a28ae3f",
      "arcName": "Voyage and Return",
      "arcSlug": "voyage-return",
      "beatName": "Discoveries",
      "beatSlug": "voyage-return-discoveries",
      "evidence": "Politics + China surface dual-use, governance, competitive findings.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 45,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 129,
      "from": 121,
      "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
      "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
      "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3c-e3f52cae2e3c",
      "evidence": "Repeated US-vs-China data on R&D spend, semiconductor deficit, citation quality.",
      "position": 20,
      "objective": "Compare China vs US across R&D, semis, automation, IPOs and patents",
      "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
      "confidence": 78,
      "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}