{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f6fdd8f57895",
  "docSlug": "3a892393f72c1ff5",
  "documentTitle": "2019 Air Street Capital The State of AI Report 2019",
  "authorId": "AirStreetCapital",
  "authorName": "Nathan Benaich and Ian Hogarth",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "vc_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "VC research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.777,
  "pageNumber": 126,
  "pageCount": 136,
  "prevPage": 125,
  "nextPage": 127,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 24,
  "notes": "Includes a secondary visualization below the bar chart representing the value of deals using bubble sizes.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "bubble_chart"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f6fdd8f57895/126",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f6fdd8f57895",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f6fdd8f57895.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5c-f6fdd8f57895#slide-126",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "2018 saw 33 IPOs of Chinese companies on US exchanges, (2x YoY) and close to the all time high in 2010.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-41ac-7180-a80a-784b6092ab2d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.4,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.17,
        "y": 0.33
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Bar chart of Chinese IPOs on US exchanges 1995-2018",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f15dd700-e842-483f-9893-47434caa2543",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.17,
        "y": 0.75
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Bubble chart representing value of deals",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bubble",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "28ea6266-adf4-4f4e-ad84-0d14e9a78027",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.17
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "2018 saw 33 IPOs of Chinese companies on US exchanges, (2x YoY) and close to the all time high in 2010. In 2018, there were a total of 190 IPOs in the US.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0356ade8-12bf-4f6b-9911-028a20a3ba2c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Number of IPOs: 33",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-41ac-7180-a80a-7c24f4e253a8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.04,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.92
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "FT",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "df1df968-30a1-4ebc-9d9d-60fcaafa6823",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.11
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Despite trade tensions, Chinese companies continue to IPO on US public market",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "72d9a5a6-ed9c-4e65-ba83-13fb1ed8decd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0fd5-7148-8ecd-e7d435010513",
      "evidence": "Callout: '33 IPOs ... 2x YoY ... near 2010 high'.",
      "confidence": 75
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "980f5444-c600-4256-8e4c-6fb88b39e795",
      "evidence": "chart/bar-vertical: Bar chart of Chinese IPOs on US exchanges 1995-2018",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 129,
      "from": 93,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-d256aedd9e9f",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Politics and China sections interpret what the technical facts mean geopolitically.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 129,
      "from": 93,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e34-e3d02a28ae3f",
      "arcName": "Voyage and Return",
      "arcSlug": "voyage-return",
      "beatName": "Discoveries",
      "beatSlug": "voyage-return-discoveries",
      "evidence": "Politics + China surface dual-use, governance, competitive findings.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 45,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 129,
      "from": 121,
      "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
      "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
      "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3c-e3f52cae2e3c",
      "evidence": "Repeated US-vs-China data on R&D spend, semiconductor deficit, citation quality.",
      "position": 20,
      "objective": "Compare China vs US across R&D, semis, automation, IPOs and patents",
      "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
      "confidence": 78,
      "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}