{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-64885b718f1e",
  "docSlug": "9169de9da530a61b",
  "documentTitle": "Newmark May 2023 FI Conference Presentation Vf Final",
  "authorId": "GoldmanSachs",
  "authorName": "Newmark",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.779,
  "pageNumber": 11,
  "pageCount": 46,
  "prevPage": 10,
  "nextPage": 12,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The slide uses a combination of a comparison table and a bar chart to highlight growth and improvement.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "data_table",
    "bar_chart_grouped",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-64885b718f1e/11",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-64885b718f1e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-64885b718f1e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-64885b718f1e#slide-11",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.4,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.5
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Newmark's Performance: Revenue, EBITDA, and Net Leverage from FY2017 to FY2022",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d411a577-2afd-44f8-83ec-5efe61108d73",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "1. \"Net debt\" is defined as total corporate debt, net of cash... 2. For all averages shown on this chart, the peers are US tickers CBRE, CIGI, CWK JLL, MMI, and WD, and UK ticker symbol SVS.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "17d5663a-27da-49b7-a1ea-222682c5666a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Adjusted EBITDA: 14% CAGR",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-1d6d-7403-aea4-e8aeedf67dff",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Newmark vs Peers: Total Revenues (11% vs 10% CAGR), Adjusted EBITDA (14% vs 10% CAGR), Net Leverage (Improved 3.0X vs No Change)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ea51c5e7-4e5a-4f8f-9b04-15c5d61b7f80",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "History of Strong Operating Performance & Improving Credit Metrics Since IPO in 2017",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fff3cf8c-9ac7-43a2-bc04-9264bfadccad",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "f8e699ad-4674-4a52-a985-8f3f90ede399",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Slides 9-21 provide evidence and proof of Newmark's financial performance and growth prospects",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 9,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "0554058f-d0cb-4a5d-9cb5-8dbe2321e97c",
      "evidence": "Slides 9-15 provide a logical chain of financial data and metrics",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To demonstrate strong financial performance",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}