{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-0711e901e65d",
  "docSlug": "10b0bc5400154c9b",
  "documentTitle": "why invest in goldman sachs",
  "authorId": "GoldmanSachs",
  "authorName": "St. John's University Student Managed Investment Fund",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.773,
  "pageNumber": 17,
  "pageCount": 28,
  "prevPage": 16,
  "nextPage": 18,
  "slideType": "financial_analysis",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 84,
  "notes": "The slide presents two line charts comparing liquidity ratios for Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, and industry/market benchmarks.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "line_chart",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-0711e901e65d/17",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-0711e901e65d",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-0711e901e65d.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-0711e901e65d#slide-17",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Goldman Sachs was in line with Bears Stearns and the industry average from 2000-2006 but outperformed the industry average from 2002-2006.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-1640-71d1-b7b4-c562566f2f78",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.23,
        "w": 0.71,
        "x": 0.145,
        "y": 0.145
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Current Ratio",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "line",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5b894ac4-1db7-46fb-a340-50a3a24b1e02",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.23,
        "w": 0.71,
        "x": 0.145,
        "y": 0.475
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Quick Ratio",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "line",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "66157685-b65f-4db0-8cdc-5ebde05b6902",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Current Ratio",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-1640-71d1-b7b4-cb93ad24eaca",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.71,
        "x": 0.145,
        "y": 0.75
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Quick Ratio- The quick ratio we employed for Goldman Sachs business and calculated as cash plus accounts receivable plus marketable securities divided by current liabilities. This ratio measures a company's ability to meet short term obligations.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5b3210e7-55af-4714-94f8-a390a2df39cd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.71,
        "x": 0.145,
        "y": 0.39
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Current Ratio- is the ability to pay back its short-term liabilities with its short-term assets. Goldman Sachs was in line with Bears Stearns and the industry average from 2000-2006 but outperformed the industry average from 2002-2006.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7bb6850d-ce60-4c35-9b36-048e13b2323a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.145,
        "y": 0.095
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "3. SHORT-TERM LIQUIDITY:",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0cd993e4-19b9-46e5-952e-5ee5d58d78a1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 11,
      "beatId": "b1466bf2-995f-4935-936c-073309dd9378",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Financials",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-financials",
      "evidence": "The document provides a detailed financial analysis, including peer benchmarking and relative valuation.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 12,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "dddd97ee-c6a6-4d72-a2f0-009cfc25ecec",
      "evidence": "The document provides a peer benchmarking analysis, covering net income, operating performance, and other financial metrics.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To evaluate Goldman Sachs' financial performance relative to its peers.",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}