{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-0711e901e65d",
  "docSlug": "10b0bc5400154c9b",
  "documentTitle": "why invest in goldman sachs",
  "authorId": "GoldmanSachs",
  "authorName": "St. John's University Student Managed Investment Fund",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.773,
  "pageNumber": 12,
  "pageCount": 28,
  "prevPage": 11,
  "nextPage": 13,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 24,
  "notes": "The slide title is 'Net Income', but the action title is the primary takeaway.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "line_chart",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-0711e901e65d/12",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-0711e901e65d",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-0711e901e65d.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd5a-0711e901e65d#slide-12",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "from 2005 to 2006 Goldman's Sachs EBT increases indicating profitability greater than Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch and Bear Stearns.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-1640-71d1-b7b4-e2093ad2a2f0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.72,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Line chart showing net income for four financial firms over time.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "line",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e597834d-a293-4bc8-8f5a-0be29e1878d4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Net Income",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-1640-71d1-b7b4-e7b302b50de4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.72,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.37
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Net Income- Net income was calculated by subtracting interest expense and operating expenses. From 2000 to 2002, Morgan Stanley had higher net income than Goldman Sachs. However during those years Goldman Sachs reported higher net income than Merrill Lynch and Bear Stearns. In 2003, Goldman Sachs net income fell putting it behind Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley. In 2004, Goldman's Sachs net income increased putting it just behind Merrill Lynch and from 2005 to 2006 Goldman's Sachs net income increased putting it first in the industry.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "71b8dc1e-74e4-4b2d-89aa-3fc966baddfc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.72,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.09
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "from 2005 to 2006 Goldman's Sachs EBT increases indicating profitability greater than Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch and Bear Stearns.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e0728cee-0288-4a0b-80b0-91ba588cca2b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.12,
        "x": 0.14,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Net Income",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "26e5be01-d888-42a7-8e3e-46760c210f72",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 11,
      "beatId": "b1466bf2-995f-4935-936c-073309dd9378",
      "arcName": "The Sequoia Pitch",
      "arcSlug": "sequoia-pitch",
      "beatName": "Financials",
      "beatSlug": "sequoia-pitch-financials",
      "evidence": "The document provides a detailed financial analysis, including peer benchmarking and relative valuation.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 12,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "dddd97ee-c6a6-4d72-a2f0-009cfc25ecec",
      "evidence": "The document provides a peer benchmarking analysis, covering net income, operating performance, and other financial metrics.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To evaluate Goldman Sachs' financial performance relative to its peers.",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}