{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-dddef82be3b0",
  "docSlug": "b5722f8c12c21bf3",
  "documentTitle": "The importance of being human in a digital world",
  "authorId": "Deloitte",
  "authorName": "Cambridge University Press",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.667,
  "pageNumber": 212,
  "pageCount": 224,
  "prevPage": 211,
  "nextPage": 213,
  "slideType": "appendix",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "Academic text excerpt from a book or journal article by Julie E. Cohen.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-dddef82be3b0/212",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-dddef82be3b0",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-dddef82be3b0.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-dddef82be3b0#slide-212",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Strategies for bending the arc of surveillance toward the safe and just space for human wellbeing must include both legal and technical components.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-1044-75f9-bd0a-88628c676b62",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.65
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Living within the doughnut requires appropriate safeguards against forms of data-driven surveillance that cross the outer perimeter, and it also requires data-driven governance implementations necessary to attain the minimum requirements for human wellbeing.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5864d8d5-3eb2-4dd0-81cd-e8f43182924e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.575
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The doughnut model for privacy suggests important questions about the appropriate boundaries between surveillance and privacy and about the forms and modalities of legitimate data-driven governance that should inform future research and prescriptive work.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "66a752fc-046c-49d2-92ee-af322c510257",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Strategies for bending the arc of surveillance toward the safe and just space for human wellbeing must include both legal and technical components - such as, for example, reliance on surveillance proxies such as credentialing and authentication to facilitate essential governance and allocation functions in data-parsimonious ways.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8f39145e-2ab8-41fe-8a3f-5081c1922352",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.725
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Ensuring that any particular surveillance implementation remains within the space defined by the doughnut rather than drifting inexorably across the outer perimeter requires subjecting it to additional legitimacy constraints, of which I have offered five - sectoral fidelity, data parsimony, equity, openness to revision, and design for countervailing power.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "98dcf632-82e3-40b2-b012-754467111186",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.39,
        "y": 0.55
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "12.4 CONCLUSION",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2ff43b49-02a0-4442-bd2b-5a43896d33c2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "doughnut-model",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "3f895dff-d997-461b-82f0-58d46b1fbdb2",
      "evidence": "Mentioned as the primary conceptual framework for privacy boundaries.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}