{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-a2baec08f44e",
  "docSlug": "43be9a3e29edbf4e",
  "documentTitle": "KSA Banking Pulse Q3 2024",
  "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
  "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 15,
  "pageCount": 30,
  "prevPage": 14,
  "nextPage": 16,
  "slideType": "kpi_dashboard",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 15,
  "notes": "The slide uses a division symbol to illustrate the calculation of the Cost to Income Ratio from the two input charts.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "bar_chart_vertical",
    "bullet_list",
    "callout_box",
    "other"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-a2baec08f44e/15",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-a2baec08f44e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-a2baec08f44e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-a2baec08f44e#slide-15",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "C/I ratio improved marginally by 31 bps to 31.0% in Q3'24",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6b-775b-a1e3-a8a0268b27f2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.3,
        "y": 0.48
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Quarterly Operating Income (SRA bn)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1276cec6-cce4-4c43-a245-d668f3aeadd4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.3,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Quarterly Operating Expenses (SRA bn)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1a0c99cc-b4e3-41b7-bd7f-f0039abf1c52",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.65,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Cost to Income Ratio (%, Quarterly Annualized)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-vertical",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e11a8e2b-e586-4458-9663-ac12cdea3d8c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.65,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Improved, Stable, Worsened",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ea67b0b7-2d6d-417d-9003-c07f836dce8b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.33
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "C/I ratio improved marginally by 31 bps to 31.0% in Q3'24. RIBL reported the highest improvement. ALRAJHI has the lowest C/I ratio.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "84f2fd3f-3538-4115-98cb-38670eee18ad",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Cost to Income Ratio: 31.0%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6b-775b-a1e3-ad99356124b2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Banks continued to focus on operational efficiency; aggregate C/I ratio inch closer to 30% level",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8f523ee2-57e0-4c90-a613-89d2fceec15a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-10d4-718b-9f58-3aec61af09c0",
      "evidence": "Title: 'C/I ratio inch closer to 30% level.'",
      "confidence": 80
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 3,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-aa2625faac4b",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "macro + KPI tables + metric charts (L&A, NIM, C/I, asset quality)",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 70,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    },
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-ba848b6d3438",
      "arcName": "The Mountain",
      "arcSlug": "mountain",
      "beatName": "Rising Action",
      "beatSlug": "mountain-rising-action",
      "evidence": "metric-by-metric data accumulation across L&A, NIM, C/I, risk",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 16,
      "from": 15,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3f-4a0c44e9b953",
      "evidence": "Aggregate C/I to bank-by-bank ranking of cost-efficiency improvement.",
      "position": 5,
      "objective": "Benchmark cost efficiency across peers",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 75,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}