{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
  "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
  "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
  "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
  "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 18,
  "pageCount": 33,
  "prevPage": 17,
  "nextPage": 19,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 140,
  "notes": "The table highlights the impact of EBA stress test results on capital distribution potential.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "data_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/18",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-18",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.92
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Max Capital depletion = EBA Peak to Trough. P2G starting point calculation based on A&M estimates, measured as maximum CET1 * 0.25 (estimated factor), and rounded up to next 25 bps. 2023 EBA Stress Test Results | July 2023",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "dab626b2-60dc-4a6c-ac29-4c003e7d573f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Excess Capital (%): 8.99%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6b-775b-a1e5-3088d330d505",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.66,
        "x": 0.17,
        "y": 0.17
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Bank Name, Maximum CET1 Depletion (Bps), P2G (Bps), P2G Bucket (%), CET 1 (%), Total Capital Requirement (%), Excess Capital (%), Qrt.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c1470d5d-a928-4de5-b363-63e1979a5b5f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Assuming the 2021 EBA Stress Test Methodology, P2G drives winners and losers in the dividend reset race.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6dff093a-40c2-4fe8-b275-8cc2e7f026fd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "2. Potential for Capital Distribution - Dividends and Buybacks",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d352007c-a762-417f-8de8-6d769e007e4a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "bfb8197d-0c9a-4a1f-8ef1-d2ed5db6fea4",
      "evidence": "Quadrant analysis of Capital Resilience vs Capital Flexibility",
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1055-74e0-a95f-3a656fdc43d3",
      "evidence": "Same winners/losers thesis carries across continuation page.",
      "confidence": 75
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 14,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-159d0e86ada5",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Section 2 maps stress results to dividend/buyback potential via P2G",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 82,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 17,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-292af5ecc95c",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Bank-by-bank P2G winners/losers tables and 2x2",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 15,
      "name": "2x2 Matrix",
      "slug": "30-2x2-matrix",
      "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-ed7c8cf4d6c5",
      "evidence": "Builds from threshold (p15) to P2G method (p16) to bank-level tables (p17-19) to a labelled 2x2 with four quadrants (p20).",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Position banks on Capital Flexibility vs P2G to surface dividend winners/losers",
      "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot",
      "confidence": 82,
      "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}