{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
  "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
  "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
  "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
  "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 17,
  "pageCount": 33,
  "prevPage": 16,
  "nextPage": 18,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 140,
  "notes": "The table includes columns for Maximum CET1 Depletion, P2G (Bps), P2G Bucket, CET 1 (%), Total Capital Requirement (%), Excess Capital (%), and Quartile.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "data_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/17",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-17",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Assuming the 2021 EBA Stress Test Methodology, P2G drives winners and losers in the dividend reset race.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6b-775b-a1e2-606b45e75830",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Excess Capital (%): 18.37%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6b-775b-a1e2-665fd66eff0a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Max Capital depletion = EBA Peak to Trough. P2G starting point calculation based on A&M estimates, measured as maximum CET1 * 0.25 (estimated factor), and rounded up to next 25 bps. 2023 EBA Stress Test Results | July 2023",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fcc64a40-ec7b-40ff-8cd4-de1b3191c348",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "subtitle",
      "text": "Assuming the 2021 EBA Stress Test Methodology, P2G drives winners and losers in the dividend reset race.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8149a6ec-2ac7-4f95-b055-b05936cef43e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Bank Name, Maximum CET1 Depletion (Bps), P2G (Bps), P2G Bucket (%), CET 1 (%), Total Capital Requirement (%), Excess Capital (%), Qrt.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "688526d8-af9d-4d3b-a225-945a1b9c7b3d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "2. Potential for Capital Distribution - Dividends and Buybacks",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ccafb60c-0bf4-4942-aa16-c079d2de4863",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1055-74e0-a95f-3778a7039244",
      "evidence": "Title 'P2G drives winners and losers in the dividend reset race'.",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Slide recipe: the peer-gap chart",
      "slug": "peer-gap-chart-recipe",
      "agent": "designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "511ecbbf-1030-4f5c-8e09-f0a88ad52152",
      "evidence": "Bank Name, Maximum CET1 Depletion (Bps), P2G (Bps), P2G Bucket (%), CET 1 (%), Total Capital Requirement (%), Excess Capital (%), Qrt",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 14,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-159d0e86ada5",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Section 2 maps stress results to dividend/buyback potential via P2G",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 82,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 17,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-292af5ecc95c",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Bank-by-bank P2G winners/losers tables and 2x2",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 15,
      "name": "2x2 Matrix",
      "slug": "30-2x2-matrix",
      "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-ed7c8cf4d6c5",
      "evidence": "Builds from threshold (p15) to P2G method (p16) to bank-level tables (p17-19) to a labelled 2x2 with four quadrants (p20).",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Position banks on Capital Flexibility vs P2G to surface dividend winners/losers",
      "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot",
      "confidence": 82,
      "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}