{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
  "docSlug": "3265a00e3a21c662",
  "documentTitle": "AM EBA ST 2023 Results First Glance Analysis vf2 v1",
  "authorId": "AlvarezMarsal",
  "authorName": "Alvarez & Marsal",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 15,
  "pageCount": 33,
  "prevPage": 14,
  "nextPage": 16,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 114,
  "notes": "The chart illustrates capital flexibility across European banks based on 2023 EBA Stress Test results.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_stacked",
    "callout_box"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447/15",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-984379334447#slide-15",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "No incremental capital needs with only one bank falling below the old 5.5% CET1 minimum threshold (La Banque Postale)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6b-775b-a1e2-0268348a9920",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.2
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Stacked bar chart of CET1 Adverse vs Max Capital Depletion",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "20cd7629-0d86-4a3c-91c5-5ab62423933b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.63,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Max Capital Depletion; CET1 Adverse from Max Capital Depletion",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5c39851b-e026-470f-a974-f749422db4b5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "CET1 ratio: 5.5%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6b-775b-a1e2-07b639b357bf",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "2023 EBA Stress Test Results | July 2023",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "967e0e4b-7f09-49ec-930c-d91c84743ebc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "subtitle",
      "text": "No incremental capital needs with only one bank falling below the old 5.5% CET1 minimum threshold (La Banque Postale)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0ce31ad6-c7a9-44b8-9223-9bed337c68c6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "2. Potential for Capital Distribution - Dividends and Buybacks",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "89517586-aa6f-4e95-a8db-3440ba1cbb45",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1055-74e0-a95f-2bc947254dff",
      "evidence": "Title quotes 'No incremental capital needs' and names the single outlier.",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Waterfall chart",
      "slug": "waterfall-chart",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "054c1c08-1f7e-4764-8c4f-f76c608ebdf7",
      "evidence": "Stacked bar chart of CET1 Adverse vs Max Capital Depletion",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 14,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-159d0e86ada5",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Section 2 maps stress results to dividend/buyback potential via P2G",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 82,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 16,
      "from": 15,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e36-2763077973fd",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Solution & Approach",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "P2G two-step methodology presented",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 55,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 15,
      "name": "2x2 Matrix",
      "slug": "30-2x2-matrix",
      "bestFor": "Portfolio analysis, prioritization, strategic positioning",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3e-ed7c8cf4d6c5",
      "evidence": "Builds from threshold (p15) to P2G method (p16) to bank-level tables (p17-19) to a labelled 2x2 with four quadrants (p20).",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Position banks on Capital Flexibility vs P2G to surface dividend winners/losers",
      "structure": "Dimension 1 (X-axis) -> Dimension 2 (Y-axis) -> The Four Quadrants -> The Sweet Spot",
      "confidence": 82,
      "description": "Plot options on two critical dimensions to reveal the optimal quadrant"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}