{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
  "docSlug": "47b4243419de0c46",
  "documentTitle": "The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?",
  "authorId": "Kearney",
  "authorName": "ATKearney",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.678,
  "pageNumber": 8,
  "pageCount": 10,
  "prevPage": 7,
  "nextPage": 9,
  "slideType": "strategic_options",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide presents a comparison matrix of three procurement technology adoption strategies, detailing benefits and trade-offs for each.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph",
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936/8",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936#slide-8",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "There is no pre-existing, off-the-shelf game plan for adopting these new procurement technologies and architecture.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-28ae-7243-84c5-080c57ebc829",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.824,
        "x": 0.088,
        "y": 0.388
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "There is no preexisting, off-the-shelf game plan for adopting these new procurement technologies and architecture. It is a journey that requires a CPO to have vision, passion, and the willingness to take a ride, because technological progress is never a smooth path.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9039fef1-7a86-4441-aded-171e2bf08844",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.072,
        "w": 0.824,
        "x": 0.088,
        "y": 0.448
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Many procurement organizations are deciding what to do now with their aging and underutilized procurement technology assets. They can choose one of three paths to follow (see figure 6). The first option is to make a like-for-like replacement with an updated core source-to-pay (S2P) system. If they own Ariba today they can switch to Coupa or vice-versa, for example.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "db6898d7-6d70-45d2-b691-040a84db54de",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.012,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.088,
        "y": 0.94
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: A.T. Kearney analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "33880f1c-04d5-4fbc-8911-ac3ea7c60d04",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.824,
        "x": 0.088,
        "y": 0.608
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison matrix of As-is, Blend, and Best-of-breed strategies across Benefits and Trade-offs.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "comparison",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "772b0d19-a8ad-43ae-a180-1f971afbc22e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.032,
        "w": 0.458,
        "x": 0.088,
        "y": 0.352
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Begin the Journey Now",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "24ae6f9c-5b63-4888-b523-1d36cd793993",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.27,
        "x": 0.088,
        "y": 0.56
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Figure 6\nStarting the journey",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "subtitle",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2a94afc5-ee9f-4478-899d-209a298f3972",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "4a06588b-08c2-4e45-99e2-18d15ef1f05e",
      "evidence": "table/comparison: Comparison matrix of As-is, Blend, and Best-of-breed strategies across Benefits and Trade-offs.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "c2ab037c-f970-4f1e-92be-939771684527",
      "evidence": "The slide uses a table to compare three distinct strategic options for procurement technology adoption.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 8,
      "from": 8,
      "beatId": "5e562a95-76b0-4445-849e-9a7ef69b722b",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Solution",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-solution-provide-relief",
      "evidence": "The strategic options on page 8",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 8,
      "from": 2,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "21b9706f-e1ab-4255-97c2-fb1c2c3064db",
      "evidence": "The problem statement and strategic options suggest a cost of inaction loop",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What are the costs of not improving procurement technology?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}