{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
  "docSlug": "47b4243419de0c46",
  "documentTitle": "The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?",
  "authorId": "Kearney",
  "authorName": "ATKearney",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.678,
  "pageNumber": 3,
  "pageCount": 10,
  "prevPage": 2,
  "nextPage": 4,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "establish_context",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "Contains two figures: a process map of procurement functions and a timeline of M&A activity in the procurement tech space.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "process_diagram",
    "paragraph",
    "timeline_visual"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936/3",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-967984220936#slide-3",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "These dynamics put price pressure on the point solutions, killed innovation, and locked customers into big suite solutions, which ultimately led to the collective dissatisfaction so abundant today.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-28ae-7243-84c3-c419bf704999",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.32,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.12
      },
      "kind": "diagram",
      "text": "Procurement process map showing upstream and downstream functions, spend monitoring, and governance.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "process",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "44dbbf0f-c33e-4f63-959c-91f63b70514c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.18,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.75
      },
      "kind": "diagram",
      "text": "Timeline from 1995 to 2017 showing key procurement tech milestones.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "timeline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a82c1c97-46f4-4001-813a-0d4aa51f5eb4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.18,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.49
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "company), SAP, and Oracle sought to extend their enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems into procurement, which started an acquisition frenzy (see figure 2). In response, companies such as Emptoris started making their own acquisitions...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9afb95d9-e510-40a7-9db6-c918893801e4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.01,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.44
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: A.T. Kearney analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "aeef9994-127b-42ba-a96b-88fc357d6a59",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.01,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.93
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: A.T. Kearney analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b4f1206c-d058-40c6-8514-c0eea8552ca7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.7
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Figure 2 Timeline of major activity",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "24cbbac2-662d-4c08-92df-97215887f371",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.08,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Figure 1 Traditional procurement process map",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "35edd13f-e4cd-47ba-a8fb-d558488a9101",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Process flow",
      "slug": "process-flow",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "de97a306-c179-4753-bddc-91d628c1c778",
      "evidence": "diagram/process: Procurement process map showing upstream and downstream functions, spend monitoring, and governance.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "timeline",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "d4d1200f-5709-4328-976f-f28c2d893550",
      "evidence": "Figure 2 displays a chronological sequence of events.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 3,
      "from": 3,
      "beatId": "50669cb6-f687-462d-afeb-ba29467d4c1b",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Agitate",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
      "evidence": "The industry trends on page 3",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 8,
      "from": 2,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "21b9706f-e1ab-4255-97c2-fb1c2c3064db",
      "evidence": "The problem statement and strategic options suggest a cost of inaction loop",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What are the costs of not improving procurement technology?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}