{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-174b7f7da09c",
  "docSlug": "d9ee2fdc0bd7b0ec",
  "documentTitle": "enhaced data extraction using gen ai ey collaboration with wlastic",
  "authorId": "MorganStanley",
  "authorName": "EY",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 10,
  "pageCount": 16,
  "prevPage": 9,
  "nextPage": 11,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 40,
  "notes": "The slide contains four distinct bar charts comparing different performance metrics for RAG implementations.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_grouped",
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-174b7f7da09c/10",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-174b7f7da09c",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-174b7f7da09c.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd59-174b7f7da09c#slide-10",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "In both metrics, Elastic RAG consistently outperforms Naive RAG. The context relevancy score, which assesses how well the retrieved information matches the query's context, is notably higher with Elastic RAG for all banks.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-340f-723f-8a13-421f9b786ca2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.34,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Figure 2: Processing time comparison: Elastic RAG vs Naive RAG",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1ea0c973-bc0c-4fca-86ad-9dca765997d1",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.34,
        "x": 0.36,
        "y": 0.57
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Figure 5: Scalability of Elastic solution",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2404ce64-f26c-429b-b8e7-67d1a05341cc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.34,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.57
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Figure 4: Context relevancy score comparison: Elastic RAG vs Naive RAG",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4d220694-fac6-452f-8d73-a5cc558cf3a3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.34,
        "x": 0.36,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Figure 3: Accuracy Test comparison: Elastic RAG vs Naive RAG",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d45513f8-0cec-4fa7-926c-cba6b114ff6e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Accuracy",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-340f-723f-8a13-45ad4ec4aa54",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.69,
        "y": 0.44
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Figure 5 displays that various data retrieval methods, such as Elastic RAG with keywords filter (KF) and Hybrid Retrieval (vector search and BM25) with keyword filter, consistently maintain high accuracy levels.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1df37448-c6e8-48b0-b399-1fef0a987053",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.69,
        "y": 0.7
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The fusion of search technologies with generative AI, represents a significant advancement in the field, providing a scalable and precise method for data extraction from these reports.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5b695f37-4661-47bf-840b-b25ef35acae4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.69,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "RAGFigures 3 and 4 illustrate a comparative analysis of Elastic RAG against a baseline Naive RAG across five Canadian banks in terms of context relevancy and accuracy. In both metrics, Elastic RAG consistently outperforms Naive RAG.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6fe0fe6b-ec8b-4ddb-becf-4a264f46c233",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Use case implementation evaluation (Cont'd)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "eb3d110b-38aa-4f8c-a530-fedf4bc2d91c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 8,
      "beatId": "8c4a78bd-1b53-456f-9179-be874097af96",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The deck provides a case study to demonstrate the effectiveness of Gen AI in data extraction",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 8,
      "name": "The Reveal",
      "slug": "05-the-reveal",
      "bestFor": "Product launches, strategic pivots, unexpected findings",
      "matchId": "22c3ec8f-4e2e-4190-bd35-ca7dceee7d84",
      "evidence": "The deck provides a case study to demonstrate the effectiveness of Gen AI",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "Reveal the benefits of Gen AI in data extraction",
      "structure": "Setup the Question -> Build Suspense -> The Big Reveal",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Build mystery and anticipation, then deliver a surprising or powerful conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}