{
  "docId": "019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd58-58f12416821e",
  "docSlug": "c8e8c0da32666e92",
  "documentTitle": "ey iif bank risk management survey",
  "authorId": "MorganStanley",
  "authorName": "EY",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "equity_research",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Equity research",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 19,
  "pageCount": 38,
  "prevPage": 18,
  "nextPage": 20,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 11,
  "notes": "The slide presents two distinct bar charts (Figure 13 and Figure 14) summarizing survey results from CROs regarding climate risk management and impact.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph",
    "bar_chart_horizontal"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd58-58f12416821e/19",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd58-58f12416821e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd58-58f12416821e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5e88-73ef-bd58-58f12416821e#slide-19",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "CROs say they manage climate-change risks by embedding them in risk identification and assessment processes (75%, including 100% of G-SIBs and the largest banks).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-340c-7065-8a67-be9a0df70e57",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.42,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.365
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Figure 13: Which of the following are the most important mechanisms that support management of climate-change risks?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3c610544-6fb1-4381-ba03-81c8b64c9656",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.42,
        "x": 0.51,
        "y": 0.365
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Figure 14: For which risk types does your organization expect climate-change risk drivers to manifest most significantly?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "73c2c8fb-56a1-48dd-ac2f-84a35e9afd89",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Percentage of respondents: 75%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-340c-7065-8a67-c0feefd55ab2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.42,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "CROs say they manage climate-change risks by embedding them in risk identification and assessment processes (75%, including 100% of G-SIBs and the largest banks), and conducting scenario analysis and/or stress testing (58%, including 92% of G-SIBs and 89% of the largest banks, but only 34% of those with under US$50b in assets). CROs say they use scenario analysis outputs to inform capital adequacy assessments, including for the US Federal Reserve's Comprehensive Capital and Analysis Review (CCAR) and the Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) as part of the Basel framework, for internal informational purposes, and for risk appetite setting.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0b9caa2b-c270-42e4-b15f-0751234b31e0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.42,
        "x": 0.51,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "CROs expect climate risks to have the biggest impacts on credit risk (63%) and reputational risk (53%) during the next 12 months. However, there's considerable variation among G-SIBs, which are much more focused on reputational risks, and non-G-SIBs, which expect bigger impacts from credit risk. Latin American banks and those with the smallest balance sheets in the sample are least worried about reputational risk, while 100% of the biggest banks expect climate risk drivers to present reputational risk in the near term. Looking out three years, CROs expect climate-driven credit risks to increase slightly and climate-driven reputational risk to be less of a concern.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "57608f7e-7ccd-45db-9fde-bbb40dce86dc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 11,
      "beatId": "4480a53f-1a0d-4ab7-93c9-1018c03c3db8",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The document provides data tables and industry trends to support the discussion on risk priorities and challenges.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}