{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-1d72bab18495",
  "docSlug": "0b0e77be71340a95",
  "documentTitle": "Third-party governance and risk management The threats are real",
  "authorId": "Deloitte",
  "authorName": "Deloitte",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 35,
  "pageCount": 39,
  "prevPage": 34,
  "nextPage": 36,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 120,
  "notes": "Contains two stacked bar charts: one for model preference by industry, one for functions performed by in-house teams.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "callout_box",
    "bar_chart_stacked",
    "bar_chart_grouped"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-1d72bab18495/35",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-1d72bab18495",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-1d72bab18495.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16b-1d72bab18495#slide-35",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.37
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Deloitte point of view: The choice between a centralized in-house model for TPGRM versus an external service-provider based model is a vital decision that can have far-reaching strategic consequences.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4c5e0a11-57a3-49c1-85dc-fb501909a0b9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The choice between a centralized in-house model for TPGRM versus an external service-provider based model is a vital decision that can have far-reaching strategic consequences which need to be carefully considered and not undertaken recklessly.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0491-71ac-9db6-253380de55ed",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.42,
        "y": 0.5
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Expected functions of centralized in-house risk management team (% of respondents)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3e5555a2-76b2-4696-aee0-1f9b2cea217a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.55,
        "x": 0.42,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Organizations considering in-house vs. external service-provider based third-party risk management models (% of respondents)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked-100pct",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ffb2dcf2-1d57-4898-b881-7469526d2c4e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Percentage of respondents",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0491-71ac-9db6-29336c510d5a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.19
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The preference for moving to a centralized in-house function for third-party risk management rather than to an external service-provider appears to be consistently higher across all industry segments as revealed by the following data.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3f7091da-c849-46b7-a9dc-9dc5c0e95f26",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Survey results by industry segment",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4b7ed968-de5f-4867-9a81-a1fc9692878e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Comparison frame",
      "slug": "comparison-frame",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "d366a3ea-26e9-4615-9dae-e27aa28fca79",
      "evidence": "chart/bar-stacked-100pct: Organizations considering in-house vs. external service-provider based third-party risk management models (% of respondents)",
      "confidence": 0.6
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 35,
      "from": 19,
      "beatId": "2838f766-362d-4d20-8c1e-8c578de9a277",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
      "evidence": "The deck provides best practices and recommendations for implementing robust governance and risk management practices",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}