{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-799ef856734b",
  "docSlug": "048f26423c8a0b1c",
  "documentTitle": "Global Powers of Luxury Goods 2017 The new luxury consumer",
  "authorId": "Deloitte",
  "authorName": "Deloitte",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 21,
  "pageCount": 52,
  "prevPage": 20,
  "nextPage": 22,
  "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
  "function": "appendix",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 5,
  "notes": "This slide provides context on the limitations and variables affecting the report's ranking methodology.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-799ef856734b/21",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-799ef856734b",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-799ef856734b.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-799ef856734b#slide-21",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.305,
        "x": 0.355,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "There were twelve newcomers and re-entrants to the Top 100 in FY2016. Most of these were due to improved availability of data, rather than major company sales changes. For more information, see the Newcomers section. Many luxury goods companies are privately owned. Some of these file official reports containing financial information; for others, estimates are made from information sources such as press interviews and industry analysts. A small number of companies do not disclose any financial information, and so cannot be included in the Top 100.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2ed73f8f-779e-41a7-8f43-87592de19a79",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.335,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.16
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The Top 100 Global Powers of Luxury Goods companies have been ranked according to their FY2016 luxury goods sales in US dollars (US$). Changes in the rankings from year to year are generally driven by increases or decreases in company sales. However, a stronger currency vis-à-vis the dollar in FY2016 means that companies reporting in that currency may rank higher in FY2016 than they did in FY2015, all other things being equal. Conversely, companies reporting in a weaker currency may rank lower. FY2016 saw the Brexit-affected British pound weakening significantly against the US$, down 11.7 per cent, while the Japanese yen strengthened by 11.2 per cent. The Chinese yuan and Brazilian real weakened, by 6.5 per cent and 6.3 per cent respectively. Other major currencies for companies in the report saw a change of less than 5 per cent vs. the US$ in 2016: the euro, Danish krone and Hong Kong SAR dollar were virtually unchanged (<-0.5 per cent change), while other currencies weakened slightly, by between 2 per cent and 4.9 per cent. For companies, the impact of these exchange rate movements on sales depends on both their reporting currency, and the geographic spread of their business (and resulting exposure to different currencies).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9509598d-a47b-4a06-bb8b-62b4859dd317",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.305,
        "x": 0.355,
        "y": 0.115
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Impact of data availability on ranking",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cceea045-dbee-4c43-bace-0dfb2d9f9f9d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.305,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.115
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Impact of exchange rates on ranking",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d3001982-2c15-414f-b639-2d85ba7662a6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 30,
      "from": 21,
      "beatId": "33fb9663-8e32-4f13-92ba-96e7a31a22f0",
      "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
      "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
      "beatName": "Visualization",
      "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-visualization",
      "evidence": "The report includes data tables and industry trends, helping readers visualize the market",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}