{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-15ddb01cc641",
  "docSlug": "5fe4bc0c1482ad2b",
  "documentTitle": "ESG momentum: Seven reported traits that set organizations apart",
  "authorId": "McKinsey",
  "authorName": "McKinsey",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.294,
  "pageNumber": 9,
  "pageCount": 17,
  "prevPage": 8,
  "nextPage": 10,
  "slideType": "key_takeaways",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 4,
  "notes": "The slide highlights the correlation between organizational structure (centralized teams) and ESG performance.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "action_title",
    "paragraph",
    "bar_chart_grouped",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-15ddb01cc641/9",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-15ddb01cc641",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-15ddb01cc641.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a16a-15ddb01cc641#slide-9",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Respondents reporting that their organizations have developed ESG momentum are more likely than those in the lowest decile to report that their employers are very effective at bringing the best talent together from across functions to work on ESG projects.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-2e35-763d-837e-769a335008bc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.58,
        "x": 0.378,
        "y": 0.17
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Respondents who say their organizations have a central environmental, social, and governance (ESG) or sustainability team, %: 86 (leading) vs 64 (lowest-decile). Respondents who say their organizations are very effective at bringing the best talent together across functions to work on ESG projects, %: 37 (leading) vs 3 (lowest-decile).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "23a16c4a-037a-40ac-ac84-f734422f1d8e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.58,
        "x": 0.378,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "1Respondents who say their organizations' ESG performance has somewhat or significantly improved over the past 3 years, ESG investments have brought modest or significant value over the past 3 years, and ESG performance is significantly better than industry peers; n = 107.\n2Respondents who say their organizations' ESG performance is significantly or somewhat worse than industry peers; n = 100.\nSource: McKinsey Global Survey on environmental, social, and governance topics, 1,141 participants at all levels of the organization, Nov 11–26, 2021",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4cfd0687-1572-49f8-a8da-4237b0662f9b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.605,
        "y": 0.125
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Respondents at organizations leading on ESG dimensions; Respondents at lowest-decile organizations",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b6bd90c3-f779-43e5-a16d-90d83d8cdc05",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Percentage of respondents: 86",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-2e35-763d-837e-7aa9fa18ecca",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.63,
        "w": 0.29,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.055
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "5. A central team\nSurvey results suggest that having a central ESG team or function can enable ESG momentum: respondents who say their organizations are furthest ahead on ESG dimensions are much more likely than those at reported lowest-decile organizations to report that their organizations have such a team, even if the team includes five or fewer people. These teams can manage ESG-strategy-and target-setting processes, coordinate delivery of initiatives and ESG reporting across the organization, and ensure that ESG considerations are embedded into employees' day-to-day behaviors. They also coordinate across functions so that efforts are not siloed within one department.\n\nIn fact, bringing together talent from across the organization to help meet ESG goals is also a reported hallmark of leading organizations. Respondents reporting that their organizations have developed ESG momentum are more likely than those in the lowest decile to report that their employers are very effective at bringing the best talent together from across functions to work on ESG projects.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f4b04c26-3616-4af7-874e-295bf3654f37",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.07,
        "w": 0.58,
        "x": 0.378,
        "y": 0.055
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Respondents reporting the most ESG momentum say their organizations have a central ESG team as well as cross-functional ESG projects.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c065f95d-5dab-4240-b2ff-4322af6889ef",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 17,
      "from": 5,
      "beatId": "a6381d14-9f1d-4b6f-9be4-89f3d38263d2",
      "arcName": "The Sparkline",
      "arcSlug": "sparkline",
      "beatName": "New Bliss",
      "beatSlug": "sparkline-new-bliss",
      "evidence": "Key takeaways and insights on ESG traits and momentum",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 2,
      "name": "Golden Circle",
      "slug": "11-golden-circle",
      "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements",
      "matchId": "75445c1a-8ff1-4e7c-bffa-13565f6ea59d",
      "evidence": "The deck presents a series of key takeaways that address the golden circle of why, how, and what organizations are doing in ESG",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What are the key traits of organizations leading in ESG dimensions?",
      "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}