{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833",
  "docSlug": "0e5e77bd2a5ace9c",
  "documentTitle": "Hydrogen applications and business models",
  "authorId": "Kearney",
  "authorName": "Kearney",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 159,
  "pageCount": 192,
  "prevPage": 158,
  "nextPage": 160,
  "slideType": "business_case",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 6,
  "notes": "The chart illustrates the threshold of grid emissions intensity required to make grid-coupled electrolyzers effective for CO2 reduction compared to wind/solar.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "line_chart",
    "icon_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833/159",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-f222b31ea833#slide-159",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "For top coal consumer countries, coupling electrolyzer with the grid would not allow for reducing CO2 emissions, except for Russia and the United States.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6a-74c9-8aac-f685ba342174",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.8,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "CAC vs. CO2 emissions from electricity gen. (2030)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "line",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8398eb46-31fa-46b1-a29d-cd2500bab1c5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.8,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.83,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "P2P systems connected to the grid and REN could save CO2 emissions from coal turbines if CO2 intensity from power sector does not exceed 500g (grid + wind case). For top coal consumer countries, coupling electrolyzer with the grid would not allow for reducing CO2 emissions, except for Russia and the United States. However, the carbon avoided cost is higher than a wind-powered electrolyzer. Countries with an average low carbon footprint from electricity generation (below 200g per kWh) could reduce CO2 emissions from coal turbines at an abatement cost of $45 to $100 per tCO2.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "167e3be5-bb6e-4a96-a93d-296fb03ec94c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Carbon abatement cost: $200",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6a-74c9-8aac-f8043c794f8f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.92
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Note: CAC is carbon abatement cost. The hypothesis is detailed in the appendix. Sources: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; Kearney Energy Transition Institute analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "20f2a0f2-778d-4bf0-85bc-42d108a40e97",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "The top coal consumers would not reduce CO2 emissions by coupling electrolyzer with grid, except the United States and Russia, but at a higher cost than RES",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5165d546-99fd-46ef-ae13-38f3a6fa9080",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}