{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e",
  "docSlug": "20eb9b28f09b8375",
  "documentTitle": "Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage",
  "authorId": "Kearney",
  "authorName": "Kearney",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 86,
  "pageCount": 166,
  "prevPage": 85,
  "nextPage": 87,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The slide includes a 'Technology readiness level' arrow at the bottom, implying a maturity ranking.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table",
    "other"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e/86",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e#slide-86",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Chemical absorption is the most mature carbon capture technology option",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6a-74c9-8aba-a617f6882952",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.24,
        "x": 0.49,
        "y": 0.89
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Technology readiness level",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "30946678-a6bc-40fc-840e-685c640c051d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Technology readiness level",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6a-74c9-8aba-a98b924aad45",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.46,
        "x": 0.27,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Sources: International Energy Agency \"Special Report on Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage\" (2020); Kearney Energy Transition institute analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "df8f6a73-09a9-4c49-a7a4-399fa1a7042e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.46,
        "x": 0.27,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison matrix of Chemical absorption, Physical absorption, and Physical adsorption across Stage, Capture rates, Temperature, Importance, Countries, and Projects.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9bdb5544-61e9-4383-be18-7af66647c443",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Chemical absorption is the most mature carbon capture technology option",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ccc9ef95-88d7-43ed-ba84-8c297a296cb9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.27,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Overview of key carbon capture technologies in chemicals",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "be38f0ea-18a5-4abc-8a70-bcd3a0e23a5e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "cf4aaa2b-b3d5-4a38-93b5-08e79bf44a18",
      "evidence": "Comparison matrix of Chemical absorption, Physical absorption, and Physical adsorption",
      "confidence": 0.5
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 166,
      "from": 41,
      "beatId": "fe8271bb-772f-484a-a616-dfe52603a74c",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
      "evidence": "Outlook, economics, policies, and regulations.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}