{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e",
  "docSlug": "20eb9b28f09b8375",
  "documentTitle": "Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage",
  "authorId": "Kearney",
  "authorName": "Kearney",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 77,
  "pageCount": 166,
  "prevPage": 76,
  "nextPage": 78,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The slide uses a maturity scale at the bottom (High to Low) to contextualize the technologies.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e/77",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e#slide-77",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Chemical absorption is the most mature carbon capture technology option",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6a-74c9-8ab8-d4b6e6e94dd9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.88
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Technology readiness level: High to Low",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ad9e845f-ed10-4a58-8148-0a59426bb8cf",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Technology readiness level",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6a-74c9-8ab8-d8c8a6fac66f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.96
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Sources: International Energy Agency \"Special Report on Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage\" (2020); Kearney Energy Transition institute analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0a7390d0-b3a4-4670-a840-2be46c2ad604",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.27,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison matrix of 5 technologies across 6 rows of attributes",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a157dde4-715f-4edc-8424-2f962c3d4433",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Chemical absorption is the most mature carbon capture technology option",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0fc59957-fadd-4814-9746-395d6e6d1b39",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Overview of key carbon capture technologies in iron and steel",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "40c4fe84-57d6-4805-94fa-f4b0e5d7bdfc",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison-frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "2bdeb0e7-4f78-4d8e-bbe5-55cf2125e1bf",
      "evidence": "Table comparing multiple technologies across standardized criteria",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 166,
      "from": 41,
      "beatId": "fe8271bb-772f-484a-a616-dfe52603a74c",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
      "evidence": "Outlook, economics, policies, and regulations.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}