{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e",
  "docSlug": "20eb9b28f09b8375",
  "documentTitle": "Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage",
  "authorId": "Kearney",
  "authorName": "Kearney",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 75,
  "pageCount": 166,
  "prevPage": 74,
  "nextPage": 76,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 20,
  "notes": "The slide includes a footer note about technology readiness levels and data sources.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e/75",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e#slide-75",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Chemical absorption is currently the most mature carbon capture technology option for the cement sector",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6a-74c9-8ab7-bec0a8c003a9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.27,
        "y": 0.86
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Technology readiness level arrow",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2c523e53-0c06-42d3-8319-98466d01fe07",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Technology readiness",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6a-74c9-8ab7-c223e86b135b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.27,
        "y": 0.91
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Membrane based separation and electrolyzer-based process for decarbonating calcium carbonate not profiled due to low technological readiness level. Sources: Special Report on Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage International Energy Agency 2020; https://www.westkueste100.de/, Kearney Energy Transition institute analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a99f85b1-2cdc-41b6-bbed-5e6879ece6c7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.27,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison matrix of 5 technologies across 5 criteria",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "07cc8566-a336-49dd-956b-16566e00707e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Chemical absorption is currently the most mature carbon capture technology option for the cement sector",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ca4799bd-6fad-41f0-8dc0-283c57ecc874",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.27,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Overview of key carbon capture technologies in cement",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "28056257-c94e-447a-82a7-33066898cc67",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "6cf47881-5f31-4518-879c-e3737a7a5d0b",
      "evidence": "table/data: Comparison matrix of 5 technologies across 5 criteria",
      "confidence": 0.5
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_table",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "b4c0948b-62e1-4985-b161-a03c8dd1726c",
      "evidence": "Table comparing 5 technologies across 5 attributes",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 166,
      "from": 41,
      "beatId": "fe8271bb-772f-484a-a616-dfe52603a74c",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
      "evidence": "Outlook, economics, policies, and regulations.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}