{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e",
  "docSlug": "20eb9b28f09b8375",
  "documentTitle": "Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage",
  "authorId": "Kearney",
  "authorName": "Kearney",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 63,
  "pageCount": 166,
  "prevPage": 62,
  "nextPage": 64,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 15,
  "notes": "The table is ordered by technology readiness level from high to low.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e/63",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a169-e74518cecd2e#slide-63",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Chemical absorption is the most mature carbon capture technology option in power generation",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6a-74c9-8ab8-a4033304664d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Technology readiness level",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd952-0a6a-74c9-8ab8-a9d2ea85766f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.27,
        "y": 0.93
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Sources: \"Special Report on Carbon Capture Utilisation and Storage\" International Energy Agency 2020; Kearney Energy Transition institute analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d794b0b4-64d0-46f7-abad-2f0dae8c1331",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.8,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.27,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison matrix of 5 carbon capture technologies",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "08c22651-8996-40a5-bec2-a4e194ea3e54",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Chemical absorption is the most mature carbon capture technology option in power generation",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "10110a43-a8a9-460c-8bed-5da12bc0b27c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.02
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Overview of key carbon capture technologies in power generation",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "68da82c3-572c-44d7-928a-f1e64eb3aabb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "ad83d35b-c88c-4d7d-94bd-fcd5ab7252c1",
      "evidence": "The slide contains a comparison matrix of 5 carbon capture technologies.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "f7f281a7-aab3-444a-8180-6b169cc1c0ca",
      "evidence": "The slide has a title/action-title component.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_table",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "f711067e-67e0-42b4-a63e-94f16502fefd",
      "evidence": "Structured comparison of technologies across multiple attributes.",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 166,
      "from": 41,
      "beatId": "fe8271bb-772f-484a-a616-dfe52603a74c",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
      "evidence": "Outlook, economics, policies, and regulations.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}