{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-4b5517286c92",
  "docSlug": "d2b4b6ca270d25e0",
  "documentTitle": "Executive Compensation at Deloitte Delivering global insight and expertise",
  "authorId": "Deloitte",
  "authorName": "Deloitte",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 5,
  "pageCount": 13,
  "prevPage": 4,
  "nextPage": 6,
  "slideType": "peer_benchmark",
  "function": "compare_peers",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 20,
  "notes": "The slide uses dot plots to compare median CEO compensation across 10 geographies.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "scatter_plot"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-4b5517286c92/5",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-4b5517286c92",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-4b5517286c92.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-4b5517286c92#slide-5",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The US is a clear outlier in terms of overall levels of compensation, particularly at higher levels of performance (due to the additional gearing from higher LTI award levels).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-c239-70c0-9600-10e9fc682a9e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.175
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "CEO Remuneration Opportunity at Target Performance",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "dot",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "083098fb-c620-4a68-83fe-a833da28ccc2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.52,
        "y": 0.175
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "CEO Remuneration Opportunity at Maximum Performance",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "dot",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "55b2dd85-57b5-4f85-9ad8-b4c9edaa3436",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.85
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "The US is a clear outlier in terms of overall levels of compensation, particularly at higher levels of performance (due to the additional gearing from higher LTI award levels). Differentiation across most of the other markets is relatively limited – eight countries have target total compensation between c. $2.5m and $3.5m.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "946dc7b6-a023-4ff7-bac9-7ec28fb7c047",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "CEO Remuneration",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-c239-70c0-9600-14b51b891ca7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.05,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.03
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "03",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8d9898de-0c07-43f9-acd8-9a42711a3247",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Slide recipe: the peer-gap chart",
      "slug": "peer-gap-chart-recipe",
      "agent": "designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "e0b8eb11-b667-42b9-9cfc-4e09f5213e0a",
      "evidence": "chart/dot: CEO Remuneration Opportunity at Maximum Performance",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 3,
      "beatId": "456b7238-9bde-4899-9e1f-37d88f8369e4",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "The document discusses the challenges of remunerating executives due to differing laws, regulations, and stakeholder expectations.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 6,
      "from": 3,
      "name": "Logic Chain",
      "slug": "01-logic-chain",
      "bestFor": "Skeptical audiences, controversial recommendations, rigorous analysis",
      "matchId": "e6566c98-b16e-4f98-b6ae-310f0e8515c6",
      "evidence": "The document presents a logical chain of data and trends to support its arguments.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Understand the complexity of executive compensation",
      "structure": "Premise 1 (Accepted truth) -> Premise 2 (Observed fact) -> Therefore... (Inevitable conclusion)",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Build an airtight chain of logic where each premise leads inevitably to the conclusion"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}