{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-03ff77f0e8e6",
  "docSlug": "f1908081edc72a08",
  "documentTitle": "Aluminum Cans Market Assessment - Australia",
  "authorId": "RolandBerger",
  "authorName": "Roland Berger",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 15,
  "pageCount": 35,
  "prevPage": 14,
  "nextPage": 16,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 16,
  "notes": "Part 2 of 2 of a state-level legislative framework analysis.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "data_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-03ff77f0e8e6/15",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-03ff77f0e8e6",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-03ff77f0e8e6.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a168-03ff77f0e8e6#slide-15",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Recycling rate: 90%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-e591-76ed-beb0-751c557eeb30",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "1) Deposit Return Scheme (Container Deposit Scheme); overall return rates [2021]; 2) Single Use Plastic. Source: Market research, Australian States legislation, Roland Berger",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c98ab1db-fd83-4287-8731-4c1516752a70",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.95,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Summary of state waste policies for Queensland, Western Australia, ACT, and Northern Territory across development, CDS, landfill bans, SUP bans, documents, and targets.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b4f1ee67-58ea-4dfd-aa08-aeb222dca497",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Most states have taken significant action to promote circular economy and sustainable waste management, with still some notable regional differences (2/2)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "46b6145e-bed8-4661-bad5-94f197080746",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 24,
      "from": 12,
      "beatId": "64c0000f-a099-457f-b99a-be1379d4505c",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "Discusses challenges in waste management, collection rates, and recycling infrastructure.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    },
    {
      "to": 34,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "6636d026-3856-4ee0-87e6-ee9a78089877",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Presents data and statistics to support the analysis, including market trends and financial viability.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 12,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "b58f26fd-c32d-428b-9147-52174f2629f5",
      "evidence": "The document highlights the challenges and limitations of the current waste management system.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "What are the consequences of not improving recycling infrastructure and collection rates?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}