{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04",
  "docSlug": "190510b49511442d",
  "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+",
  "authorId": "RolandBerger",
  "authorName": "Lazard",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 29,
  "pageCount": 48,
  "prevPage": 28,
  "nextPage": 30,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 16,
  "notes": "The chart uses a bar-grouped format to compare unsubsidized vs subsidized costs for four different hydrogen production scenarios.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "bar_chart_horizontal",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/29",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-29",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "While hydrogen-ready natural gas turbines are still being tested, preliminary results, including our illustrative LCOH analysis, indicate that a 25% hydrogen by volume blend is feasible and cost competitive",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa5-7563-a12e-9115389615f7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.91,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "LCOE comparison chart for Green and Pink Hydrogen (PEM/Alkaline)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a15991aa-b29e-4453-844b-92970e5051ec",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.88
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "This analysis assumes a fuel blend of 25% hydrogen and 75% natural gas by volume. Results are driven by Lazard's approach to calculating the LCOE...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0b69d227-068f-464b-8223-262b5e2dd7c7",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Levelized Cost of Energy ($/MWh): $110 - $228/MWh",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa5-7563-a12e-958047991050",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.91,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.215
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "While hydrogen-ready natural gas turbines are still being tested, preliminary results, including our illustrative LCOH analysis, indicate that a 25% hydrogen by volume blend is feasible and cost competitive",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2b265d0f-be69-4c06-92ed-c5b20a7bd6a4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.86
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Lazard and Roland Berger estimates and publicly available information.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "682824d5-1b06-43d2-8002-6094f73c01a8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.85,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.155
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Levelized Cost of Energy Comparison—Gas Peaking with 25% Hydrogen Blend",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8ac1197b-cbdf-4fd4-ae66-eb7715d2f773",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c428-765c-a01e-084e2dc1f290",
      "evidence": "Title states '25% hydrogen blend is feasible and cost competitive'",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Annotation",
      "slug": "annotation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c46d-727f-b828-fc4c452dbb09",
      "evidence": "Callout supports the cost-competitive claim",
      "confidence": 65
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c449-74e1-8936-f4b3623acd37",
      "evidence": "Horizontal bar chart for LCOE with hydrogen blend",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Layering and Separation",
      "slug": "layering-and-separation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c48e-708a-8b7e-95524f3b63df",
      "evidence": "Dark unsubsidized bars vs light subsidized bars",
      "confidence": 65
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 50,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Deeper Layer",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 35,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 28,
      "name": "Tale Two Worlds",
      "slug": "04-tale-two-worlds",
      "bestFor": "Competitive analysis, benchmarking, case for change",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-bb7c-75bc-aa8f-b43ffbf7abfc",
      "evidence": "Subsidized vs unsubsidized green/pink LCOH (p.28) then a 25% blend LCOE compared to standard gas peaking range (p.29).",
      "position": 5,
      "objective": "Compare hydrogen pathway costs against gas-peaking benchmark",
      "structure": "Current State -> Desired State / Benchmark -> The Gap & Implication",
      "confidence": 50,
      "description": "Show the gap between two states to drive urgency or highlight opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}