{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04",
  "docSlug": "190510b49511442d",
  "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+",
  "authorId": "RolandBerger",
  "authorName": "Lazard",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 25,
  "pageCount": 48,
  "prevPage": 24,
  "nextPage": 26,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 7,
  "notes": "The slide presents stacked bar charts showing revenue components for seven specific use cases, with IRR percentages displayed above each bar.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_stacked",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/25",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-25",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Project economics evaluated in the Value Snapshot analysis continue to evolve year-over-year as costs change and the value of revenue streams adjust to reflect underlying market conditions, utility rate structures and policy developments.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa5-7563-a12e-624dd9b8d734",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.44,
        "x": 0.51,
        "y": 0.305
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Behind-the-Meter Revenue stacked bar chart",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "28f85152-91a9-427b-bc63-b550d6874ef3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.44,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.305
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "In-Front-of-the-Meter Revenue stacked bar chart",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5f64cad5-d262-4ce4-b5d6-86fbfde93ccb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.91,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.8
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "Energy Arbitrage, Frequency Regulation, Spinning/Non-Spinning Reserves, Resource Adequacy, Local Incentive Payments, Bill Management, Demand Response-Utility, Subsidized IRR",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b1cfba3c-e848-4f31-b88a-5f21ca038a70",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "IRR: 41.7%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa5-7563-a12e-65f217132115",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.91,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.218
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Project economics evaluated in the Value Snapshot analysis continue to evolve year-over-year as costs change and the value of revenue streams adjust to reflect underlying market conditions, utility rate structures and policy developments",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "040d4436-a245-4bcc-a401-e5138fa5bc27",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.91,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.88
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Lazard and Roland Berger estimates, Enovation Analytics and publicly available information. Note: Levelized costs presented for each Value Snapshot reflect local market and operating conditions...",
      "attrs": {
        "numbered": true
      },
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a5cd1b80-67d6-4b07-9100-d770fefc079d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.43,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.158
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Value Snapshot Case Studies—Results",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a9dece1d-cab5-496c-9e7f-c41322943e33",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Annotation",
      "slug": "annotation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c315-72a9-8d8e-293b23d74a99",
      "evidence": "Callout on evolving project economics; IRR data labels",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c336-73df-82d5-ad56723c8a1a",
      "evidence": "Stacked bars decompose revenue sources",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Small Multiples",
      "slug": "small-multiples",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c359-77c0-b769-691afc2dc1cf",
      "evidence": "IFM and BTM panels in parallel",
      "confidence": 65
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 50,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Deeper Layer",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 35,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 25,
      "from": 20,
      "name": "Segmentation Split",
      "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
      "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-bb5a-7354-9f03-67db31523c3b",
      "evidence": "LCOS comparisons by configuration (p.20-21), revenue-stream matrix (p.22), then case-study results decomposed by segment (p.23-25).",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Segment LCOS economics by storage use case (IFM vs BTM)",
      "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
      "confidence": 55,
      "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}