{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04",
  "docSlug": "190510b49511442d",
  "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+",
  "authorId": "RolandBerger",
  "authorName": "Lazard",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 24,
  "pageCount": 48,
  "prevPage": 23,
  "nextPage": 25,
  "slideType": "geographic_map",
  "function": "illustrate_case",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 7,
  "notes": "The slide maps seven distinct energy storage project scenarios across four US regions.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "map",
    "paragraph",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/24",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-24",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.18,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "US Map",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "map",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e7ae8150-18c5-40e4-a717-001997d5df98",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.265
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Los Angeles, CA: Utility-Scale CAISO (100 MW / 400 MWh)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "86121284-bf38-47a3-98eb-5b0ff94ac81b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.18,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.69,
        "y": 0.24
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "San Francisco, CA: C&I Standalone (1 MW / 2 MWh) and C&I PV + Storage (0.5 MW / 2 MWh)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b6af7fe9-89b1-435c-9d69-5a27a6e0cff0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.18,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.65
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Honolulu, HI: Residential Standalone and PV + Storage (0.006 MW / 0.025 MWh)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "bfbb8aa6-143f-4fbe-9d94-b1e5c2327507",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.18,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.69,
        "y": 0.55
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Corpus Christi, TX: Utility-Scale PV + Storage and Wind + Storage (50 MW / 200 MWh)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "da1ee388-4df9-4739-b7f1-bb1bc6f2300f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.215
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Lazard's Value Snapshots analyze the financial viability of illustrative energy storage systems designed for selected use cases",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8efad651-951b-49e3-a063-cfd2b2813fa6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.91
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Lazard and Roland Berger estimates, Enovation Analytics and publicly available information.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ebd50ef9-5902-4e42-afb0-e4b77bb0ac10",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.155
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Value Snapshot Case Studies—Overview (cont'd)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "69d3dc7b-d274-4af5-8224-fc27011275ad",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c2f3-764f-be4a-987379499ec4",
      "evidence": "Geographic visualization for spatial reference",
      "confidence": 60
    },
    {
      "name": "Picture Superiority Effect",
      "slug": "picture-superiority-effect",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c2d2-7759-bc2d-9b773d70e32f",
      "evidence": "U.S. map locates the seven case studies geographically",
      "confidence": 70
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "map-spatial",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "efa2cb3e-9dcc-41ff-bdcb-3ac7a713a70c",
      "evidence": "Geographic distribution of case studies on a US map",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 50,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Deeper Layer",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 35,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 25,
      "from": 20,
      "name": "Segmentation Split",
      "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
      "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-bb5a-7354-9f03-67db31523c3b",
      "evidence": "LCOS comparisons by configuration (p.20-21), revenue-stream matrix (p.22), then case-study results decomposed by segment (p.23-25).",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Segment LCOS economics by storage use case (IFM vs BTM)",
      "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
      "confidence": 55,
      "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}