{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04",
  "docSlug": "190510b49511442d",
  "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+",
  "authorId": "RolandBerger",
  "authorName": "Lazard",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 21,
  "pageCount": 48,
  "prevPage": 20,
  "nextPage": 22,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 20,
  "notes": "The chart uses a bar-chart style to represent cost ranges for different storage use cases, categorized by 'In-Front-of-the-Meter' and 'Behind-the-Meter'.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_grouped",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/21",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-21",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.51,
        "w": 0.91,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.295
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "LCOS comparison chart",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1e69fdf8-aeba-4fdc-ab72-31d096fe0534",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.1,
        "w": 0.91,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.86
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Source: Lazard and Roland Berger estimates and publicly available information. Note: Here and throughout this section... (1) (2) (3) This sensitivity analysis assumes...",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "3711316c-97b3-4b21-81e5-04174f7b301b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.36,
        "y": 0.835
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "LCOS, Subsidized (incl. Energy Community), Subsidized (excl. Energy Community)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "e89cd850-f149-48f9-9d66-8c26a9f96e52",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "LCOS ($/kW-year): $1,445",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa5-7563-a12f-2142823bd05e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.91,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.218
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Lazard's LCOS analysis evaluates standalone energy storage systems on a levelized basis to derive cost metrics across energy storage use cases and configurations(1)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d1da37d0-70a8-4721-96c9-f7a0f28e9cda",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.028,
        "w": 0.695,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.158
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Levelized Cost of Storage Comparison—Version 9.0 ($/kW-year)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "319dee60-a3af-4655-9f9e-03c594054bf2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c1be-7129-89e4-8d52553826d6",
      "evidence": "Grouped bar chart for $/kW-year metric",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Layering and Separation",
      "slug": "layering-and-separation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c203-7149-b1c2-0be31594e485",
      "evidence": "Three subsidy scenarios per config",
      "confidence": 60
    },
    {
      "name": "Small Multiples",
      "slug": "small-multiples",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c1e1-7689-b35d-f542bfcb45c6",
      "evidence": "Same configurations as p.20 in parallel chart",
      "confidence": 65
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 50,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Deeper Layer",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 35,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 25,
      "from": 20,
      "name": "Segmentation Split",
      "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
      "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-bb5a-7354-9f03-67db31523c3b",
      "evidence": "LCOS comparisons by configuration (p.20-21), revenue-stream matrix (p.22), then case-study results decomposed by segment (p.23-25).",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Segment LCOS economics by storage use case (IFM vs BTM)",
      "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
      "confidence": 55,
      "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}