{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04",
  "docSlug": "190510b49511442d",
  "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+",
  "authorId": "RolandBerger",
  "authorName": "Lazard",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 20,
  "pageCount": 48,
  "prevPage": 19,
  "nextPage": 21,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 30,
  "notes": "The chart uses a grouped bar format to compare three cost scenarios (LCOS, Subsidized incl. Energy Community, Subsidized excl. Energy Community) across five storage configurations.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bar_chart_horizontal",
    "paragraph",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/20",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-20",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.48,
        "w": 0.81,
        "x": 0.145,
        "y": 0.29
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Grouped bar chart showing LCOS, Subsidized (incl. Energy Community), and Subsidized (excl. Energy Community) costs for 5 storage types.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5493fe19-831d-47a2-8579-dab87588c412",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.11,
        "w": 0.91,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.86
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "Source: Lazard and Roland Berger estimates and publicly available information. Note: Here and throughout this section... [detailed methodology notes]",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1a2e124b-d665-4121-b64e-9f42acb79082",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.57,
        "x": 0.39,
        "y": 0.835
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "LCOS; Subsidized (incl. Energy Community); Subsidized (excl. Energy Community)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fefa2300-10cc-41e4-b192-994a47752a9a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Levelized Cost of Storage ($/MWh)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa5-7563-a12d-18eb0ca81e9e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.91,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.215
      },
      "kind": "subtitle",
      "text": "Lazard's LCOS analysis evaluates standalone energy storage systems on a levelized basis to derive cost metrics across energy storage use cases and configurations(1)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9d128e5b-cf52-4703-96b7-a72587275509",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.67,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.155
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Levelized Cost of Storage Comparison—Version 9.0 ($/MWh)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a8ad07a7-49fe-4d16-a872-377796541001",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Chunking",
      "slug": "chunking",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "loop",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c17d-72e1-8cbc-d4bc80bcc874",
      "evidence": "IFM vs BTM segment headers chunk the data",
      "confidence": 60
    },
    {
      "name": "Inductive Reasoning",
      "slug": "inductive-reasoning",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "loop",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c19d-778a-b222-587ed5bbccc2",
      "evidence": "Anchors loop 4: many use cases build to segmentation insight",
      "confidence": 55
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c134-716a-8fa2-2974fed3e84f",
      "evidence": "Grouped horizontal bar chart for LCOS configurations",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Layering and Separation",
      "slug": "layering-and-separation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-c15c-7354-8510-3a29a18d76d5",
      "evidence": "Three cost scenarios shown side by side",
      "confidence": 65
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 50,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Deeper Layer",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 35,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 25,
      "from": 20,
      "name": "Segmentation Split",
      "slug": "34-segmentation-split",
      "bestFor": "Customer analysis, market research, resource allocation",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-bb5a-7354-9f03-67db31523c3b",
      "evidence": "LCOS comparisons by configuration (p.20-21), revenue-stream matrix (p.22), then case-study results decomposed by segment (p.23-25).",
      "position": 4,
      "objective": "Segment LCOS economics by storage use case (IFM vs BTM)",
      "structure": "The Aggregate View -> Segment A Behavior -> Segment B Behavior -> The Insight in the Difference",
      "confidence": 55,
      "description": "Divide a whole into meaningful segments to reveal hidden patterns"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}