{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04",
  "docSlug": "190510b49511442d",
  "documentTitle": "Lazard LCOE+",
  "authorId": "RolandBerger",
  "authorName": "Lazard",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 12,
  "pageCount": 48,
  "prevPage": 11,
  "nextPage": 13,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 24,
  "notes": "The chart uses a grouped bar approach to show baseline LCOE versus LCOE adjusted for carbon pricing.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "bar_chart_horizontal",
    "paragraph",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04/12",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-fb14f4d30a04#slide-12",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Carbon pricing is one avenue for policymakers to address carbon emissions; a carbon price range of $40 – $60/Ton(1) of carbon would increase the LCOE for certain conventional generation technologies, as indicated below",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa5-7563-a12d-4db286816f71",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "LCOE comparison chart",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a1a05e97-cc38-4127-8fa5-d94e340029ab",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "LCOE ($/MWh): $40-$60/Ton",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa5-7563-a12d-53620cd8374b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Carbon pricing is one avenue for policymakers to address carbon emissions; a carbon price range of $40 – $60/Ton(1) of carbon would increase the LCOE for certain conventional generation technologies, as indicated below",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cad90b6d-f6d0-46fd-8405-8d0184ab72b9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.88
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Lazard and Roland Berger estimates and publicly available information. Note: Unless otherwise noted, the assumptions used in this sensitivity correspond to those used in the LCOE analysis as presented on the page titled “Levelized Cost of Energy Comparison—Version 17.0”. (1) In November 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency proposed a $204/Ton social cost of carbon. (2) The low and high ranges reflect the LCOE of selected conventional generation technologies including an illustrative carbon price of $40/Ton and $60/Ton, respectively.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f6ef01c8-b4cc-431e-ae4c-fa48c5e479a9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.045,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Levelized Cost of Energy Comparison—Sensitivity to Carbon Pricing",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "51851f23-44b8-4ee7-8233-ae85723f0c3e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Contrast Pairs",
      "slug": "contrast-pairs",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "loop",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-beb0-744b-998f-5019a670e5f1",
      "evidence": "Baseline vs carbon-priced contrast",
      "confidence": 60
    },
    {
      "name": "Annotation",
      "slug": "annotation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-be6c-747f-9c5c-5f142c822a66",
      "evidence": "Callout sets $40-60/Ton carbon price scope",
      "confidence": 65
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-be8e-710c-aeed-f1ead8652d0d",
      "evidence": "Bar chart comparing baseline LCOE vs carbon-priced LCOE",
      "confidence": 70
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 9,
      "beatId": "019de8e9-b9e8-7495-9d03-f088e78d95b4",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "LCOE/LCOS/LCOH benchmarking, sensitivity, cost-component charts",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 50,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    },
    {
      "to": 29,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "019de8e9-ba8d-77ee-ae2c-b5633a8eaa8c",
      "arcName": "The Onion",
      "arcSlug": "onion",
      "beatName": "Deeper Layer",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "LCOE, LCOS, LCOH detailed comparisons and sensitivities",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 35,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 9,
      "name": "Sensitivity Test",
      "slug": "52-sensitivity-test",
      "bestFor": "Financial models, forecasting, risk assessment",
      "matchId": "019de8e9-bb13-71cb-9670-75a55146cdcb",
      "evidence": "Base-case comparison (p.9) followed by sensitivity to subsidies, fuel, carbon, capital (p.10-13), then firming/competitive comparisons (p.14-15).",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "Stress-test LCOE robustness across multiple parameters",
      "structure": "The Base Case -> Assumption A Varies -> Assumption B Varies -> Robustness of Conclusion",
      "confidence": 70,
      "description": "Show how conclusions change (or don't) when key assumptions vary"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}