{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414",
  "docSlug": "93b13afae2ded546",
  "documentTitle": "April Macro Brief: Special edition Tariff distress",
  "authorId": "Accenture",
  "authorName": "Accenture",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 36,
  "pageCount": 41,
  "prevPage": 35,
  "nextPage": 37,
  "slideType": "impact_sizing",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 10,
  "notes": "The chart distinguishes between tariffs 'in effect' and those 'pending or under future consideration'.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "action_title",
    "subtitle_text",
    "bar_chart_stacked",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414/36",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414#slide-36",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Industrials face a 45.2% projected tariff-driven cost increase on imported inputs, the highest of any US sector",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a673-77f6-869e-6a810154c911",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.52,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.34
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Projected tariff impact on cost of imported goods inputs",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-stacked",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "31781d97-e254-4acb-823c-e140cf8ed0c2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.5,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.75,
        "y": 0.35
      },
      "kind": "legend",
      "text": "China reciprocal, Partial reciprocal, China fentanyl, Canada fentanyl, Mexico fentanyl, Steel, Aluminium, Autos, Remaining reciprocal, Semiconductors, Pharma, Copper, Lumber, Consumer electronics",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "32c6f011-c293-4550-8ac3-e93b39a699ed",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Projected tariff impact on cost of imported goods inputs (% increase): 45.2%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a673-77f6-869e-6ecddcb60a83",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.87
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Notes: 1/ For each industry, we calculated the exposure of total imports of goods... Sources: BEA, US Census Bureau, USITC, Accenture Strategy analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b9df0092-16d7-4e46-8fff-ec2548da253b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "subtitle",
      "text": "Exposure of US industries to import tariffs (1/2)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a542f559-0409-40c5-8a97-ab1327993d57",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.94,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Among the major goods-importing sectors, many are facing a 30%+ increase in the cost of their foreign inputs, with the bulk of impact coming from the reciprocal and country-specific tariffs",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "493cc4bc-6d5a-4c7e-bb9c-318bc3ddea6e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Projected tariff impact on cost of imported goods inputs (% increase)",
      "numberRaw": "45.2%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "Among the major goods-importing sectors, many are facing a 30%+ increase in the cost of their foreign inputs, with the bulk of impact coming from the reciprocal and country-specific tariffs",
      "calloutText": "Industrials face a 45.2% projected tariff-driven cost increase on imported inputs, the highest of any US sector",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 45.2,
      "metricFamily": "cost_savings",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Chunking",
      "slug": "chunking",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "loop",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0bbb-77da-b1d5-b19484fb0935",
      "evidence": "Tariff sources chunked into named categories with shared legend.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0bbb-77da-b1d5-a0e1bfb6ea4a",
      "evidence": "Title: 'many are facing a 30%+ increase in the cost of their foreign inputs'.",
      "confidence": 95
    },
    {
      "name": "Annotation",
      "slug": "annotation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0bbb-77da-b1d5-aee3401c831c",
      "evidence": "Right-side bracket separates 'In effect' from 'Pending or under future consideration'.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Color Strategy",
      "slug": "color-strategy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0bbb-77da-b1d5-a722694c99f6",
      "evidence": "Stacked bars color-coded by tariff type (China reciprocal, fentanyl, steel, autos, etc.).",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Visual Hierarchy",
      "slug": "visual-hierarchy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0bbb-77da-b1d5-aadf53a4804c",
      "evidence": "Industries sorted top-down by total exposure (Industrials 45.2% first).",
      "confidence": 85
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "Pareto Bar Chart",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1ca5-70bb-bb9b-38001edc9dc4",
      "evidence": "Industries ranked top-down by total tariff cost increase, descending order.",
      "confidence": 80
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 37,
      "from": 20,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-cb2ca5df426b",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Americas/EMEA/APAC region impacts and industry exposure — the consequences.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 85,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    },
    {
      "to": 37,
      "from": 20,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-daca7c03f11c",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-solution-approach",
      "evidence": "Quantified country/region/industry impacts.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": "Turn",
      "parentBeatSlug": "turn"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 37,
      "from": 36,
      "name": "Pareto Focus",
      "slug": "50-pareto-focus",
      "bestFor": "Resource allocation, problem prioritization, efficiency improvements",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-98b1dc35ea1b",
      "evidence": "Sectors ranked by % cost increase (Industrials 45.2% -> Life Sciences 18.5%) then services-side ranking — focuses attention on top exposures.",
      "position": 7,
      "objective": "Identify the vital few industries facing the highest tariff cost burden",
      "structure": "The Full Distribution -> The Vital Few (20%) -> The Trivial Many (80%) -> Focus Recommendation",
      "confidence": 75,
      "description": "Show that 80% of results come from 20% of causes to drive prioritization"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}