{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414",
  "docSlug": "93b13afae2ded546",
  "documentTitle": "April Macro Brief: Special edition Tariff distress",
  "authorId": "Accenture",
  "authorName": "Accenture",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 17,
  "pageCount": 41,
  "prevPage": 16,
  "nextPage": 18,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The table provides a breakdown of tariff rates, value of impacted goods, percentage of imports, specific products, and non-tariff measures for each region.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "action_title",
    "comparison_table",
    "bullet_list",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414/17",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-998cd2e4c414#slide-17",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Retaliatory measures enacted or threatened in response to US tariffs",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a672-7739-9cf7-f26d2841a93d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Value of impacted US goods: USD 164bn",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a672-7739-9cf7-f737668fd6f3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Sources: Accenture Strategy analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b0de1658-de78-49bc-967d-a93f0703f35c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Comparison of retaliatory measures by China, Canada, and EU across tariff rates, value, impact, and non-tariff measures.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d7b0f86b-cf80-4a8b-b2ed-884a5faf64f5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Only China and Canada have retaliated to date, though EU has signaled potential countermeasures depending on how negotiations evolve",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a84c2e77-776b-47a8-b1ef-b1f533260a2a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Value of impacted US goods",
      "numberRaw": "USD 164bn",
      "numberKind": "plain",
      "actionTitle": "Only China and Canada have retaliated to date, though EU has signaled potential countermeasures depending on how negotiations evolve",
      "calloutText": "Retaliatory measures enacted or threatened in response to US tariffs",
      "numberScale": "b",
      "numberValue": 164,
      "metricFamily": "other",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0bbb-77da-b1d5-01054e8c601c",
      "evidence": "Title states 'Only China and Canada have retaliated to date'.",
      "confidence": 90
    },
    {
      "name": "Annotation",
      "slug": "annotation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0bbb-77da-b1d5-0716699b1951",
      "evidence": "Country-by-country annotations of retaliatory measures and dollar values.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Comparison frame",
      "slug": "comparison-frame",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "b6c42360-bbd2-4afc-ab70-706137732080",
      "evidence": "Comparison of retaliatory measures by China, Canada, and EU across tariff rates, value, impact, and non-tariff measures",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 19,
      "from": 4,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-c4ef101612f7",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Exec summary, macro KPIs, tariff timeline & waterfall — establishes what is happening.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 85,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    },
    {
      "to": 19,
      "from": 11,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0680-7418-8208-d59403340719",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "Aggressive tariff rollout, scenarios deteriorating.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 19,
      "from": 16,
      "name": "Scenario Fork",
      "slug": "35-scenario-fork",
      "bestFor": "Strategic planning, risk analysis, board presentations",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fd-712f-b772-88b9666879fd",
      "evidence": "Country-specific tariff rates -> retaliation tracker -> bubble exposure map -> 3-scenario fork (Pragmatic / Holding / Disorderly) on p.19.",
      "position": 3,
      "objective": "Lay out country exposure and retaliation logic ending in three forward scenarios",
      "structure": "The Decision Point -> Scenario A (If X) -> Scenario B (If Y) -> Scenario C (If Z) -> Recommendation",
      "confidence": 85,
      "description": "Present multiple futures based on different assumptions or decisions"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}