{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2",
  "docSlug": "9a95b8480d09e70a",
  "documentTitle": "Unlocking alpha in deals",
  "authorId": "Accenture",
  "authorName": "Accenture",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 25,
  "pageCount": 30,
  "prevPage": 24,
  "nextPage": 26,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 8,
  "notes": "The chart highlights a stark contrast: PE firms heavily favor 'Buy as a service' (92%), while Corporate M&A teams show a more distributed preference, with 'Buy off the shelf' being the most common (40%).",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "action_title",
    "paragraph",
    "bar_chart_grouped",
    "subtitle_text",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2/25",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2#slide-25",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "PE firms overwhelmingly prefer to buy intelligence solutions as a service (92%), prioritizing speed, control and scalability. In contrast, 40% of corporate M&A teams lean toward developing solutions with partners, valuing ease of implementation and access to expertise.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a673-77f6-86a3-853cbe53b9f2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.4,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.34,
        "y": 0.4
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Percentage of dealmakers and their preferences",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-grouped",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b75909be-63ac-47da-9596-c4bcc9472587",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "PE dealmakers preferring 'Buy as a service': 92%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a673-77f6-86a3-8b81c2763674",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.3,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.27
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Our research shows that while corporate M&A and PE professionals align on the need to apply advanced analytics and AI to their deal cycle, their sourcing strategies differ. PE firms overwhelmingly prefer to buy intelligence solutions as a service (92%), prioritizing speed, control and scalability. In contrast, 40% of corporate M&A teams lean toward developing solutions with partners, valuing ease of implementation and access to expertise.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "573b128e-a193-43d3-8e74-8c93bf2a5e05",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.12,
        "x": 0.83,
        "y": 0.73
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Accenture Research, Transaction Advisory Survey 2025, n=650.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "11f9763a-1faf-4b32-943c-d82d92f3d996",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.34,
        "y": 0.27
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Corporate M&A and PE deal professionals take different approaches to intelligence solutions.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "bc98294a-6a56-4f20-acf9-1513fee65526",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.5,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "How corporate M&A and PE differ in tech sourcing strategies",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d11251ad-3f03-4cf0-9488-abc78f14c553",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "PE dealmakers preferring 'Buy as a service'",
      "numberRaw": "92%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "How corporate M&A and PE differ in tech sourcing strategies",
      "calloutText": "PE firms overwhelmingly prefer to buy intelligence solutions as a service (92%), prioritizing speed, control and scalability. In contrast, 40% of corporate M&A teams lean toward developing solutions with partners, valuing ease of implementation and access to expertise.",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 92,
      "metricFamily": "volume_count",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0fd4-7109-906d-8f90ac3d8014",
      "evidence": "Figure 5 title states segmentation finding: M&A and PE differ in tech sourcing.",
      "confidence": 88
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0fd4-7109-906d-9298d57fa020",
      "evidence": "Side-by-side bar chart appropriate for cross-segment preference comparison.",
      "confidence": 82
    },
    {
      "name": "Comparison frame",
      "slug": "comparison-frame",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "7c88238e-7dd7-4305-b5a6-34fc9647cfb7",
      "evidence": "PE firms overwhelmingly prefer to buy intelligence solutions as a service (92%), prioritizing speed, control and scalability.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "Small Multiples",
      "slug": "small-multiples",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0fd4-7109-906d-944c57c5b2fc",
      "evidence": "Identical 4-color bar encoding repeated for PE and Corporate M&A segments.",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Visual Hierarchy",
      "slug": "visual-hierarchy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0fd4-7109-906d-98d43f90b6f5",
      "evidence": "Tallest bars (92%, 40%) draw attention as dominant preferences.",
      "confidence": 75
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "Buy / Build / Partner",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1ca5-70bb-bba0-2cce51d1739c",
      "evidence": "Legend lists Develop in-house / Develop with vendor / Buy off shelf / Buy as a service.",
      "confidence": 80
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 26,
      "from": 17,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-f2c5f2b74a1b",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Figures 3-5 with 1.3x, 3.2x, 5.7x benchmarks plus CTAs",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 25,
      "from": 14,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-fd7b23707725",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Three-step framework + benchmark proof of impact",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 26,
      "from": 23,
      "name": "Tradeoff Triangle",
      "slug": "38-tradeoff-triangle",
      "bestFor": "Resource allocation, strategic choices, expectation setting",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3b-994b0801b6c2",
      "evidence": "p24 'structured buy/build/partner strategy'; p25 segments PE (92% buy) vs M&A (40% partner); p26 CTA reconciles three options.",
      "position": 7,
      "objective": "Frame buy vs build vs partner trade-off for sourcing",
      "structure": "Priority A vs Priority B vs Priority C -> What We're Optimizing For -> What We're Sacrificing -> Why This Trade-Off",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Show that you can only optimize for 2 of 3 competing priorities"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}