{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2",
  "docSlug": "9a95b8480d09e70a",
  "documentTitle": "Unlocking alpha in deals",
  "authorId": "Accenture",
  "authorName": "Accenture",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 24,
  "pageCount": 30,
  "prevPage": 23,
  "nextPage": 25,
  "slideType": "client_example",
  "function": "illustrate_case",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 1,
  "notes": "The slide uses a split layout with text on the left and a pull-quote on the right.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "quote_block"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2/24",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2#slide-24",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Only 31% rate their current approach as highly effective while the remaining 69% see room for improvement—highlighting the challenge of embedding AI in a way that delivers results.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a673-77f6-86a3-6aa3d3458dd3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Dealmakers rating current approach as highly effective: 31%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a673-77f6-86a3-73adf3ad6c8e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.43
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "With an abundance of tech solutions, dealmakers must determine whether to build, buy or partner—a decision shaped by strategic fit, integration needs and speed-to-market. In most cases, building in-house makes sense for core capabilities that require full control and deep integration, while buying externally provides a faster route to market-tested solutions. Partnering with specialists is a pragmatic middle ground: It brings access to specialized expertise and emerging innovations without the heavy lift of ownership or deployment. A North American PE firm has taken a thoughtful approach to AI adoption. It launched a multi-phase transformation to integrate advanced tools, technologies and strategic frameworks.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0afc4e85-8d8d-427d-9dc0-47859741a56b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "x": 0.36,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Working with specialists, it designed a blueprint to shape an AI platform, and then rapidly deployed solutions and use cases. Combining “buy” and “build” strategies helped the firm test, refine and scale new capabilities in a controlled environment—enhancing operational efficiencies and strengthening its competitive position. However, most dealmakers lack such a clear decision framework. Only 31% rate their current approach as highly effective while the remaining 69% see room for improvement—highlighting the challenge of embedding AI in a way that delivers results.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1c59d277-b6ac-4364-9e72-68c577bb4d59",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The landscape of next-gen deal technologies is evolving rapidly—dealmakers who wait for the perfect solution risk falling behind. Successful dealmakers take a two-pronged approach to stay ahead of the curve: They partner with specialists to tap into cutting-edge innovation and run structured experiments to turn that innovation into competitive advantage.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "88e20982-a4c8-48bd-bc34-d65eb1d1d013",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "x": 0.67,
        "y": 0.54
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "– Head of Corporate Development, European multinational",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "bee027d1-f75e-4c31-9da2-0ad748b2d28e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "x": 0.36,
        "y": 0.55
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The most forward-thinking dealmakers test, iterate and scale in real time. They build a culture of innovation by experimenting with new tools, failing and learning fast, and creating a domino effect that drives future advancements and material capabilities. In today’s hypercompetitive deal market, the ability to pivot fast and scale what works gives a decisive edge. Partnering with specialists and experimenting continuously helps dealmakers close capability gaps and stay ahead of the curve. This approach seamlessly integrates technology, talent and innovation into a future-ready strategy.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c953d8e6-b5e6-4d20-83e7-343ef3a4c0f0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "x": 0.67,
        "y": 0.29
      },
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "We took a small stake in Perplexity and integrated it with our backend as seamless connectivity is key for core operations. For business applications, it makes sense to deploy capital. For M&A processes, we will buy the best external solutions available.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "pull-quote",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c4936e73-39d3-4830-a5c7-769dcbc4b88a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "quote",
      "text": "\"We took a small stake in Perplexity and integrated it with our backend as seamless connectivity is key for core operations. For business applications, it makes sense to deploy capital. For M&A processes, we will buy the best external solutions available.\" – Head of Corporate Development, European multinational",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Authority citation",
      "toolSlug": "authority-citation",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a673-77f6-86a3-6fe9be28ad86",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "x": 0.36,
        "y": 0.46
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Accelerate innovation through experimentation",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f3adf13e-a5e6-4d70-9d91-ec850a0905e5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.34
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Build a structured buy/build/partner strategy",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f751f172-0f9f-4928-9ba0-9e8bf37ddef6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "Dealmakers rating current approach as highly effective",
      "numberRaw": "31%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": "Build a structured buy/build/partner strategy",
      "calloutText": "Only 31% rate their current approach as highly effective while the remaining 69% see room for improvement—highlighting the challenge of embedding AI in a way that delivers results.",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 31,
      "metricFamily": "volume_count",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0fd4-7109-906d-84d7863d7282",
      "evidence": "Title 'Build a structured buy/build/partner strategy' states the prescription.",
      "confidence": 82
    },
    {
      "name": "Contrast Principle",
      "slug": "contrast-principle",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0fd4-7109-906d-88b63b0677bf",
      "evidence": "31% effective vs 69% room for improvement contrast frames the gap.",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Story Moments",
      "slug": "story-moments",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "4d44c2f9-70e4-41e3-bff5-ebd079124831",
      "evidence": "The most forward-thinking dealmakers test, iterate and scale in real time.",
      "confidence": 0.6
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "Buy / Build / Partner",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1ca5-70bb-bba0-2a9c69f35998",
      "evidence": "Title: 'Build a structured buy/build/partner strategy'.",
      "confidence": 88
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 26,
      "from": 17,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-f2c5f2b74a1b",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "Figures 3-5 with 1.3x, 3.2x, 5.7x benchmarks plus CTAs",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 25,
      "from": 14,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-fd7b23707725",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Implications (So What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-implications-so-what",
      "evidence": "Three-step framework + benchmark proof of impact",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": "Reflection",
      "parentBeatSlug": "reflection"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 26,
      "from": 23,
      "name": "Tradeoff Triangle",
      "slug": "38-tradeoff-triangle",
      "bestFor": "Resource allocation, strategic choices, expectation setting",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3b-994b0801b6c2",
      "evidence": "p24 'structured buy/build/partner strategy'; p25 segments PE (92% buy) vs M&A (40% partner); p26 CTA reconciles three options.",
      "position": 7,
      "objective": "Frame buy vs build vs partner trade-off for sourcing",
      "structure": "Priority A vs Priority B vs Priority C -> What We're Optimizing For -> What We're Sacrificing -> Why This Trade-Off",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Show that you can only optimize for 2 of 3 competing priorities"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}