{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2",
  "docSlug": "9a95b8480d09e70a",
  "documentTitle": "Unlocking alpha in deals",
  "authorId": "Accenture",
  "authorName": "Accenture",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 10,
  "pageCount": 30,
  "prevPage": 9,
  "nextPage": 11,
  "slideType": "key_takeaways",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 4,
  "notes": "The slide uses a split-screen layout with a white background on the left for data and a dark background on the right for context.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "big_number",
    "paragraph",
    "headline_text",
    "callout_box"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2/10",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-96004b13b0f2#slide-10",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "These data points show that returns from generative AI tend to compound—and become more predictable—when dealmakers adopt it strategically across the deal lifecycle.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a673-77f6-86a2-269b842d0fb8",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.12,
        "x": 0.268,
        "y": 0.38
      },
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "7%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "big-number",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6833c5c7-240e-41a9-a722-071d912d275c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.12,
        "x": 0.073,
        "y": 0.38
      },
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "71%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "big-number",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f734ad98-dad7-4f7f-ac60-8bb3e44f9dd9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "dealmakers using generative AI in only 2-4 of 12 M&A lifecycle stages: 71%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-a673-77f6-86a2-2986f50bc3e9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.07,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.073,
        "y": 0.218
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "This gap between generative AI's perceived value and actual investment is resulting in point solutions and fragmented adoption. Not a single dealmaker applies generative AI across all stages of the deal lifecycle. Instead:",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "47ad84ca-602d-4ed8-8802-669640db971b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.073,
        "y": 0.76
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "These data points show that returns from generative AI tend to compound—and become more predictable—when dealmakers adopt it strategically across the deal lifecycle.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "82619bc8-9bac-4687-b2cf-fc2c538f814d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.29,
        "x": 0.633,
        "y": 0.29
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Our research shows PE firms have greater confidence in AI's value than corporate M&A professionals, particularly in early deal stages. This conviction, despite PE's tendency to be conservative when it comes to new technology adoption, is driving higher generative AI investment. Further, PE firms with assets under management (AUM) over $50 billion are investing significantly more in generative AI than smaller firms with AUM under $25 billion.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "84713fee-f926-42a2-b126-222a49f71263",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.073,
        "y": 0.45
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "use generative AI in only 2-4 of the 12 stages of the M&A deal lifecycle we assessed.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9f4f2090-3c0e-444b-9ec9-542d71ecd029",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.268,
        "y": 0.45
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "leverage generative AI in at least half of the 12 stages. This group is over 4x more likely to report they consistently capture post-acquisition value.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d86cc3a2-c6ef-4300-b2ef-8ca98f785271",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.025,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.633,
        "y": 0.218
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Private equity's AI advantage",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "bfd197a5-44bf-48d7-bf44-d36ad4c9712d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [
    {
      "metricRaw": "dealmakers using generative AI in only 2-4 of 12 M&A lifecycle stages",
      "numberRaw": "71%",
      "numberKind": "percent",
      "actionTitle": null,
      "calloutText": "These data points show that returns from generative AI tend to compound—and become more predictable—when dealmakers adopt it strategically across the deal lifecycle.",
      "numberScale": null,
      "numberValue": 71,
      "metricFamily": "volume_count",
      "numberCurrency": null
    }
  ],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0fd4-7109-906c-e3a82f73435c",
      "evidence": "'Private equity's AI advantage' is an insight headline, not a topic.",
      "confidence": 78
    },
    {
      "name": "Contrast Principle",
      "slug": "contrast-principle",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0fd4-7109-906c-ea6cd333cf7f",
      "evidence": "71% (only 2-4 stages) vs 7% (>=6 stages) creates stark contrast.",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "So What? Test",
      "slug": "so-what-test",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0fd4-7109-906c-eed6a8b1c7f4",
      "evidence": "Callout: 'returns from generative AI tend to compound when adopted strategically'.",
      "confidence": 80
    },
    {
      "name": "Visual Hierarchy",
      "slug": "visual-hierarchy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-0fd4-7109-906c-e6ecb63c42e6",
      "evidence": "Oversized 71% and 7% numbers dominate the layout as focal points.",
      "confidence": 88
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-ebdb7ccc1ea8",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "Strategy/tech out of sync, GenAI lag chart, complexity factors",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 92,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    },
    {
      "to": 13,
      "from": 8,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0682-776c-8e33-fa0f06399aaa",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Facts (What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-facts-what",
      "evidence": "Charts and stats on AI gap and complexity",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 60,
      "parentBeatName": "Setup",
      "parentBeatSlug": "setup"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 10,
      "from": 7,
      "name": "Aha Moment",
      "slug": "03-aha-moment",
      "bestFor": "Data-heavy sections, research findings, analytical arguments",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-07fe-70ce-8d3b-8aeeb8946760",
      "evidence": "Figure 1 contrasts 79%/74%/73% expected value vs 31%/32%/14% investment, then PE advantage.",
      "position": 3,
      "objective": "Reveal the gap between expected value and actual GenAI investment",
      "structure": "The Problem/Question -> What the Data Shows -> The Insight",
      "confidence": 85,
      "description": "Establish a tension, present data, then deliver the insight that changes everything"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}