{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-8662550b5828",
  "docSlug": "d3f864f14826ffb3",
  "documentTitle": "Digitizing Make in India Report 2024",
  "authorId": "BCG",
  "authorName": "BCG",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 59,
  "pageCount": 64,
  "prevPage": 58,
  "nextPage": 60,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "present_framework",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The slide outlines specific quantitative thresholds for metrics like Revenue Growth, Margins, ROCE, and Promoter Shareholding.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-8662550b5828/59",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-8662550b5828",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-8662550b5828.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-8662550b5828#slide-59",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "IPO readiness criteria",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-acbc-7050-b10d-2ec921561552",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.89
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: Matrix Perspective",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "97934e72-2a6a-42e4-ac4c-6c5c5956b3d9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.189
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Metric and Criteria at IPO Filing table",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "aff95c6c-4cae-4c0f-b603-a2f6b38fe4a4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.07
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "What does it take to list a B2B company?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "90992e1f-afd7-4448-a9f8-4ac014cce289",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1321-706c-9a5d-c9bc90fc49ca",
      "evidence": "Title poses 'What does it take to list a B2B company?'",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Table data",
      "slug": "table-data",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "324d644e-66bb-4e83-bfd1-b19c5bbe8446",
      "evidence": "table/data: Metric and Criteria at IPO Filing table",
      "confidence": 0.9
    },
    {
      "name": "Visual Hierarchy",
      "slug": "visual-hierarchy",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-1321-706c-9a5d-cef5c9e7a597",
      "evidence": "Comparison table with structured criteria",
      "confidence": 70
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 61,
      "from": 54,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87da-fe8e923d3e28",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "B2B funding napkin and 5-yr IPO trendlines validate model",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 80,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    },
    {
      "to": 62,
      "from": 58,
      "beatId": "019dd95a-0702-74a3-87db-0fb3b38d3b98",
      "arcName": "The Triple Take",
      "arcSlug": "triple-take",
      "beatName": "The Action (Now What)",
      "beatSlug": "triple-take-the-action-now-what",
      "evidence": "IPO benchmarks and call-to-contact",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 65,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 61,
      "from": 58,
      "name": "Benchmark Gap",
      "slug": "39-benchmark-gap",
      "bestFor": "Performance improvement, competitive analysis, target setting",
      "matchId": "019dd95a-088b-72c8-b7e3-3ae41466d949",
      "evidence": "State of IPOs, what it takes, then ROCE/EBITDA/CAGR medians for <750Cr and >750Cr issues.",
      "position": 10,
      "objective": "Use IPO benchmarks to set founder targets",
      "structure": "Our Performance -> Industry Average -> Best-in-Class -> The Gap = The Opportunity",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Compare performance against best-in-class to quantify the opportunity"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}