{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-6bb0b886ba16",
  "docSlug": "83f52fa88d2d9dd9",
  "documentTitle": "Moving faster: Reinventing compliance to speed up, not trip up",
  "authorId": "PwC",
  "authorName": "PwC",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 35,
  "pageCount": 48,
  "prevPage": 34,
  "nextPage": 36,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 8,
  "notes": "The slide highlights a shift in compliance focus from headcount/capacity to skill refocusing.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph",
    "bar_chart_horizontal",
    "photo"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-6bb0b886ba16/35",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-6bb0b886ba16",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-6bb0b886ba16.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-6bb0b886ba16#slide-35",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Changes in technology and data use (63%) is now the top factor influencing compliance talent strategy, followed by the need for different skills and expertise to address new regulations, risks and business models (62%).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b39a-2df96931f955",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.64,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.57
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Bar chart showing factors: Changes in technology (63%), Different skills (62%), Expansion of responsibilities (51%), Reorganisation (30%), Cost/headcount reduction (28%), Outsourcing (19%), Loss of expertise (18%), Other (1%)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cdeba0ae-21fc-4851-a67d-e28885fb6c33",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 1,
        "w": 0.27,
        "x": 0.73,
        "y": 0
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Collage of professional and modern office/tech-related imagery",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "photo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2e5776ab-62db-4ad8-ac8e-0b6552eaa89e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Percentage of respondents: 63%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b39a-308e23f6405e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.32,
        "x": 0.36,
        "y": 0.148
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Cost pressures, the pace of regulation, and stakeholder expectations are stretching Compliance functions and their resources, often requiring them to do more with less. This is also driving them to adapt their approaches and technology use to meet the challenge.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2b7a576d-decc-44cd-81ec-35e62537dcf5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.64,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.5
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Q: What are the main factors that you anticipate will influence your organisation's compliance talent strategy over the next three years? - Ranked in top three. Base: All Respondents (1,802)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "33c65f85-d515-40b7-a9b3-c3ad2bac754a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.32,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.148
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Interestingly, Compliance function resources was ranked lower in importance (19%), perhaps indicating the continued shift in responsibility towards the first line rather than reliance on Compliance functions alone.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5f3b39c3-d4c0-4775-9695-d91cf30ce3f9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.32,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.46
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Factors influencing compliance talent strategy",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5158a8c0-2daa-421a-bb44-dce24eeaf9d3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Action Titles",
      "slug": "action-titles",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8d1-2495-734e-83d8-7e9a737a6498",
      "evidence": "Title frames the talent insight",
      "confidence": 70
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8d1-2458-7219-b7a4-a6adc0eac900",
      "evidence": "Horizontal bar of talent-strategy drivers",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "So What? Test",
      "slug": "so-what-test",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8d1-2477-715e-8234-5c339fe8679b",
      "evidence": "Callout names tech change as top factor",
      "confidence": 78
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 43,
      "from": 22,
      "beatId": "019de8d1-186a-72b2-a6bb-b98e1b51f901",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "Tech, AI, culture, talent, SCO case studies, Compliance Pioneer maturity (p22-43)",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 88,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 37,
      "from": 34,
      "name": "Capability Gap",
      "slug": "48-capability-gap",
      "bestFor": "M&A strategy, digital transformation, organizational design",
      "matchId": "019de8d1-1946-727c-84ee-0c0106bacca3",
      "evidence": "Culture drivers (p34), talent strategy factors (p35), 'most important vs skills gap' chart (p36), actions (p37)",
      "position": 6,
      "objective": "Diagnose the talent/skills gap and set actions",
      "structure": "Required Capabilities -> Current State -> The Gap -> Build vs Buy vs Partner Decision",
      "confidence": 85,
      "description": "Compare required capabilities vs. current capabilities to define the build/buy/partner decision"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}