{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-6bb0b886ba16",
  "docSlug": "83f52fa88d2d9dd9",
  "documentTitle": "Moving faster: Reinventing compliance to speed up, not trip up",
  "authorId": "PwC",
  "authorName": "PwC",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 14,
  "pageCount": 48,
  "prevPage": 13,
  "nextPage": 15,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 10,
  "notes": "Survey data from PwC's Global Compliance Survey 2025, base size 1,802.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "bar_chart_horizontal",
    "paragraph",
    "photo"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-6bb0b886ba16/14",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-6bb0b886ba16",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-6bb0b886ba16.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a167-6bb0b886ba16#slide-14",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "When asked what has influenced investment in compliance, being able to respond to regulatory issues and regulation changes were the two primary drivers for respondents (44% and 42% respectively), with risk mitigation a close third (40%).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b398-4d44a1e8bc93",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.48,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.45
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Horizontal bar chart showing 10 factors ranging from 44% to 1%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1792116d-784c-430d-b3be-3d68ac42c72d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.28,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.35,
        "y": 0
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Woman looking at a digital screen",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "photo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "67be9a71-fb15-48f2-b64f-5564e633d09a",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Percentage of respondents: 44%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-dfa2-7185-b398-53f1f1c96f90",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.55,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.66,
        "y": 0.36
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "All of this presents a conundrum: If regulation is intended to protect market and industry ecosystems and help them thrive, is the complexity that it has created actually doing the opposite? Answering this question requires understanding what value can be unlocked by approaching compliance differently, and what companies are doing to reinvent their compliance models. Many companies are relooking at their compliance models to help keep pace with regulation, minimise risk, manage costs, and respond to issues. When asked what has influenced investment in compliance, being able to respond to regulatory issues and regulation changes were the two primary drivers for respondents (44% and 42% respectively), with risk mitigation a close third (40%). Given the regulatory complexity described earlier, these investment motives are not surprising. The more interesting shift has been the number of companies investing in compliance to take advantage of new technology (32%), enhance effectiveness (30%) and reduce costs (21%). This trend is also seen in areas such as tax compliance; PwC UK's Future of the Tax Function publication highlights similar moves to connect disjointed systems and data and standardise finance and tax processes. Such changes are refocusing attention on the financial dimensions of compliance and helping compliance models achieve the right balance between value protection and value creation.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5b9f9b73-5062-4688-abd2-7cd11f74e401",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.45,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.38
      },
      "kind": "subtitle",
      "text": "Q: Which of the following have been the main factors in influencing your organisation's compliance investment decisions? Base: All Respondents (1,802)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "72c6d7bf-a802-423a-86be-d89cfbcf6e93",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.32,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.34
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Main factors influencing investment decisions",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "5b7316f0-2281-4865-b3b8-ecaeb5b0c0cb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.66,
        "y": 0.325
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Driving new decisions",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "ce2d63ff-5113-4443-8a2f-7f222f6d1f30",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Annotation",
      "slug": "annotation",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8d1-1dd9-70b0-8de3-c622f507567d",
      "evidence": "Percentages labeled on bars",
      "confidence": 75
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8d1-1d9b-70a9-8303-89b84ea013b9",
      "evidence": "Horizontal bar of investment drivers",
      "confidence": 85
    },
    {
      "name": "Chart Selection Guide",
      "slug": "chart-selection-guide",
      "agent": "Designer",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "5215ddc6-7ad7-4f3f-915e-940703392c1d",
      "evidence": "Horizontal bar chart showing 10 factors ranging from 44% to 1%",
      "confidence": 0.7
    },
    {
      "name": "So What? Test",
      "slug": "so-what-test",
      "agent": "Architect",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "019de8d1-1db9-767b-82e4-5dc3a5894627",
      "evidence": "Callout names regulatory issues as top driver",
      "confidence": 75
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 10,
      "beatId": "019de8d1-1829-727d-a409-dd4a5a3290a2",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "'Commercial conundrum' divider, 85% complexity, pain points (p10-15)",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 88,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 15,
      "from": 11,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "019de8d1-18c7-71fb-8f57-91478fcde036",
      "evidence": "85% complexity (p11), barriers (p12), human cost (p13), investment drivers (p14), actions (p15)",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "Quantify the mounting cost of complexity-driven status quo",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 80,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}