{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-f40fca6ba3f1",
  "docSlug": "1c28a4601a3bdad7",
  "documentTitle": "PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "Ipsos",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 16,
  "pageCount": 33,
  "prevPage": 15,
  "nextPage": 17,
  "slideType": "key_messages",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 1,
  "notes": null,
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "photo"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-f40fca6ba3f1/16",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-f40fca6ba3f1",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-f40fca6ba3f1.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-f40fca6ba3f1#slide-16",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "This gradual approach will resonate with the public, helping to build trust, since over half of the public (53%) believe that public services shouldn't use new technologies like AI until they have been proven reliable in other sectors.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-edad-70d9-bcfd-914682821782",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.85,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.75,
        "y": 0
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": null,
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "photo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9da59b2c-f945-4c6c-a819-44f0ce251a5b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "public trust: 53%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-edad-70d9-bcfd-94246aba689f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.35,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "At the same time, adopting clear guidelines for the use of AI will reassure the public and businesses when engaging with AI and its outputs. This gradual approach will resonate with the public, helping to build trust, since over half of the public (53%) believe that public services shouldn't use new technologies like AI until they have been proven reliable in other sectors. This will also help to alleviate existing public concerns over the sharing of personal data across public service organisations, which is key to realising the potential efficiency gains in public services from AI adoption.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b3bf7bc1-2fe9-42d7-851b-e70602cf4057",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "To build public trust in AI, policymakers and regulators need to adopt a gradual approach to expanding its use. They should start with applications that have well-defined benefits and minimal perceived risks. These initial AI deployments should be clearly linked to outcomes that matter to people. For example, using AI to reduce waiting lists, support preventative care, and to help more people stay in work align well with public priorities. Openly talking about the positive impacts of early AI projects can pave the way for public acceptance in more complex areas over time.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cf51212a-b0fe-44b1-81e7-149c428a1c7b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.28,
        "x": 0.65,
        "y": 0.18
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Policymakers and regulators also need to keep engaging with the public to understand how views on AI are evolving. For example, drawing lessons from public engagement around net zero, fairness and making sure no-one is left behind are likely to be key principles for AI rollouts too.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f3a30d8d-ded9-481a-958d-7b3a25727647",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "© Ipsos | Public Trust in AI | September 2024 | Public",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "572c1df2-3f23-4d42-b297-4d647809c464",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Building public trust in AI",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "89c06190-bdd8-46bd-ac85-273521fa4a9c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Audience Definition",
      "slug": "audience-definition",
      "agent": "Storyteller",
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "d4c27a96-fef2-4b73-8a89-03e03ba2c042",
      "evidence": "paragraph/paragraph: At the same time, adopting clear guidelines for the use of AI will reassure the public and businesses when engaging with AI and its outputs.",
      "confidence": 0.6
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 15,
      "beatId": "f1ebfba0-522b-410d-b139-fe9901eb360e",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The deck provides data and key messages on building public trust in AI, job replacement, and support.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 15,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "4dbf8276-e3fc-4ada-9ac4-31e2b0167607",
      "evidence": "The deck highlights the importance of building public trust in AI to mitigate potential risks.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What are the consequences of not addressing public concerns about AI?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}