{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-f40fca6ba3f1",
  "docSlug": "1c28a4601a3bdad7",
  "documentTitle": "PUBLIC TRUST IN AI: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND REGULATION",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "Ipsos",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 15,
  "pageCount": 33,
  "prevPage": 14,
  "nextPage": 16,
  "slideType": "key_takeaways",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": null,
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "paragraph",
    "photo"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-f40fca6ba3f1/15",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-f40fca6ba3f1",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-f40fca6ba3f1.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-f40fca6ba3f1#slide-15",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "A blanket approach is unlikely to work given the wide range of views across the population.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-edad-70d9-bcfd-4249f2591dfb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.06,
        "x": 0.92,
        "y": 0.9
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": null,
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "logo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "682dddde-d80a-42e2-8e1a-993a901cb112",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.87,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0,
        "y": 0
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": null,
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "photo",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fd465da0-9340-4b26-ae96-3d109b883252",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The use of AI in healthcare and security settings have some of the highest levels of comfort overall. However, this also hides some of the largest variations between different groups in society. For example, when it comes to healthcare, comfort is much higher among those who know about AI compared to those who do not. Similarly, men are more comfortable than women, and graduates are more comfortable than non-graduates with the potential healthcare uses.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4650d159-f615-40db-ad9e-5683f65f7c6b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.45,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.52,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "There are big differences between age groups too. Those aged 16-24 are much more likely to be comfortable than over 75s with the use of AI in media, the use of chatbots (whether in customer services, education and health settings) and in analysing personal information to tailor content for individuals. Conversely, those over 75 are much more likely to be comfortable than those aged 16-24 with the use of AI in health and security settings (e.g. detecting crime, identifying those likely to commit fraud, and detecting security threats).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6231a022-dfd4-4475-b918-1bcbf019b05d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.35,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.76,
        "y": 0.21
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "This adds further complexity to understanding public views of AI, emphasising how perceptions are shaped by broader priorities and attitudes. These findings also demonstrate that those in charge of AI policy will need to take a nuanced approach to building public trust, tailoring their communications and outreach to the needs and concerns of different groups. A blanket approach is unlikely to work given the wide range of views across the population.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "cd56a688-fff8-4640-8359-5bfce558bec4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.22,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "© Ipsos | Public Trust in AI | September 2024 | Public",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0721883f-dff2-4cd5-9963-eb93fd58d834",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.28,
        "y": 0.06
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Levels of comfort with different AI use cases vary across demographic groups",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6445c368-8be2-4b80-8322-6afd35ad83b5",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "List presentation",
      "slug": "list-presentation",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "d7e3d21b-8e07-4c54-aa82-46fb7f676f34",
      "evidence": "paragraph/paragraph: There are big differences between age groups too. Those aged 16-24 are much more likely to be comfortable than over 75s with the use of AI in media, the use of chatbots (whether in customer services,",
      "confidence": 0.6
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 15,
      "beatId": "f1ebfba0-522b-410d-b139-fe9901eb360e",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The deck provides data and key messages on building public trust in AI, job replacement, and support.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 21,
      "from": 15,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "4dbf8276-e3fc-4ada-9ac4-31e2b0167607",
      "evidence": "The deck highlights the importance of building public trust in AI to mitigate potential risks.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What are the consequences of not addressing public concerns about AI?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}