{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-0b196333179f",
  "docSlug": "3cc6fbb23e39cd42",
  "documentTitle": "IPSOS LGBT+ PRIDE REPORT 2025",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "Ipsos",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 49,
  "pageCount": 52,
  "prevPage": 48,
  "nextPage": 50,
  "slideType": "industry_trends",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 4,
  "notes": "26-country average data.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "bullet_list",
    "line_chart",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-0b196333179f/49",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-0b196333179f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-0b196333179f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a166-0b196333179f#slide-49",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.7,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.35,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Line chart showing 5% for Baby Boomers, 6% for Gen X, 9% for Millennials, and 14% for Gen Z.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "line",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a6786af5-ea53-4595-9ea3-0f727f45906b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "LGBT+ identification percentage: 14%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-f383-712f-84d0-b63c2f47fe32",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.4,
        "w": 0.24,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.3
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "26-country average. Any of: Lesbian/gay/homosexual, Bisexual, Pansexual/omnisexual, Asexual, Transgender, Non-binary/gender non-conforming/gender-fluid, Other than male or female",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "7db2cb84-0fec-45c4-97d1-9b4250bebca4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.88
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Base: 19,028 adults aged 18-74 in Canada, Republic of Ireland, South Africa, Türkiye, and the United States, 20-74 in Thailand, 21-74 in Singapore, and 16-74 in all other countries, polled between April 25 – May 9, 2025. **Generation Z (born between 1996-2012), Millennials (born between 1980-1995), Generation X (born between 1966-1979) and Baby Boomers (born between 1945-1965).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "fc1e20d9-6ce8-4d23-8736-7704b29962b4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.24,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Net % of LGBT+ Adults By Generations",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0913df62-d2e8-4f9b-8499-72ee44401284",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 52,
      "from": 41,
      "beatId": "d51af4ca-e418-4aa4-b67b-8dd3e30369fa",
      "arcName": "Monroe's Motivated Sequence",
      "arcSlug": "monroes-sequence",
      "beatName": "Action",
      "beatSlug": "monroes-sequence-action",
      "evidence": "The report concludes with implications for businesses, governments, and individuals, encouraging action towards creating a more inclusive environment.",
      "position": 4,
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 52,
      "from": 41,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "cf61310b-aa65-460a-acd7-1a2ea1e9ced2",
      "evidence": "The report implies the cost of inaction by highlighting the implications of not addressing LGBT+ issues.",
      "position": 2,
      "objective": "What is the cost of inaction in creating a more inclusive environment for the LGBT+ community?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.5,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}