{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-fef2dcc7122d",
  "docSlug": "19e310fe251af0cd",
  "documentTitle": "WORLD REFUGEE DAY",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "Ipsos",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "industry_analyst",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Industry analyst",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 44,
  "pageCount": 52,
  "prevPage": 43,
  "nextPage": 45,
  "slideType": "key_takeaways",
  "function": "summarize",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": null,
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "numbered_list"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-fef2dcc7122d/44",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-fef2dcc7122d",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-fef2dcc7122d.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-fef2dcc7122d#slide-44",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.92,
        "x": 0.038,
        "y": 0.25
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "1. Traditional and social media are the most common sources of information about refugees for the public. 2. But there is a trust gap among the public for both sources (traditional and social media). 3. Sources like personal experiences with refugees, teachers, and community or religious leaders are more trusted but fewer use them.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "numbered",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "aec7c6a5-b12a-4c77-a910-892f87df7007",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.07,
        "w": 0.24,
        "x": 0.038,
        "y": 0.105
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Key insights",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9d6d6f1c-350b-4a6b-939b-7266f8da0173",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 52,
      "from": 41,
      "beatId": "7c9b074b-a66a-491d-ade1-512d94f5435b",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Conclusion and Recommendations",
      "beatSlug": null,
      "evidence": "The deck concludes with insights and implications for policy responses.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": null,
      "parentBeatSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 52,
      "from": 41,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "71ba9865-dff4-4d96-bcc5-eeb85c93b910",
      "evidence": "The deck hints at the cost of inaction in addressing public attitudes and policy responses.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "What are the implications of not addressing public attitudes towards refugees?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}