{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ecb62fa22451",
  "docSlug": "ec7914a3d26e4467",
  "documentTitle": "PERILS OF PERCEPTION",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "Ipsos",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 9,
  "pageCount": 30,
  "prevPage": 8,
  "nextPage": 10,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "dense",
  "nDataPoints": 18,
  "notes": "The chart highlights a perception gap where low-impact actions like recycling are ranked higher in public opinion than high-impact actions like not having a car.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "paragraph",
    "bar_chart_horizontal",
    "data_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ecb62fa22451/9",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ecb62fa22451",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ecb62fa22451.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ecb62fa22451#slide-9",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The difference is clear when ranked by actual order – actions like recycling are over-estimated compared with not having a car at all or avoiding long-distance flights",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-f95c-723d-8f28-a181a148beb6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.75,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.3,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "chart",
      "text": "Comparison of perceived impact (%) vs actual CO2 savings (tonnes)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bar-horizontal",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c3331bdf-b967-4815-abe4-198bafea9a3b",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "CO2 saved (tonnes): 58.6",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-f95c-723d-8f28-a6353568c1eb",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.15,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.47
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The difference is clear when ranked by actual order – actions like recycling are over-estimated compared with not having a car at all or avoiding long-distance flights",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "124b66ef-f842-427b-bbf3-3cdb55cf0985",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.65,
        "x": 0.3,
        "y": 0.88
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Base: 1,000 online adults aged 16-74, 19 Feb – 5 Mar 2021. Source: Institute of Physics, 2017. NB: Emissions saved from having one fewer child is calculated by quantifying future emissions of descendants based on historical rates, based on heredity",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "0f61ad45-3ddf-46c0-94b7-823d87a152ef",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.25,
        "w": 0.25,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.06
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Q. From this list of options, which three do you think would most reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of an individual living in one of the world's richer countries?",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "638bcae3-2e03-4798-9979-2557e2b54a9f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.1,
        "x": 0.04,
        "y": 0.42
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Great Britain",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "subtitle",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "49b1c3d8-2646-4b80-96f8-748879b2e63f",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "b271c0df-7cb4-4c4a-a481-2b508ee90025",
      "evidence": "Comparison of perceived impact (%) vs actual CO2 savings (tonnes)",
      "confidence": 0.5
    },
    {
      "name": "Comparison frame",
      "slug": "comparison-frame",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "c7550a46-0f6f-4e92-9472-ba0d55962468",
      "evidence": "The difference is clear when ranked by actual order – actions like recycling are over-estimated compared with not having a car at all or avoiding long-distance flights",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "comparison_frame",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "22e0dd82-dac4-4ed5-b658-ec3a0be2a362",
      "evidence": "Comparing perceived vs actual impact of climate actions",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 9,
      "from": 7,
      "beatId": "8cead0d5-597d-44c8-aee5-831c5e7eebdc",
      "arcName": "Problem-Agitate-Solution",
      "arcSlug": "problem-agitate-solution",
      "beatName": "Agitate",
      "beatSlug": "problem-agitate-solution-agitate-make-it-worse",
      "evidence": "The deck agitates the problem by presenting data on the differences between public perceptions and scientific data.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Development",
      "parentBeatSlug": "development"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 9,
      "from": 4,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "f968d384-0141-47e9-877a-ef70ac727a7a",
      "evidence": "The deck presents data on the differences between public perceptions and scientific data, highlighting the consequences of inaction.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "What are the consequences of public misconceptions about climate change?",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.6,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}