{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ca6c71c657c8",
  "docSlug": "2ba8066535eababa",
  "documentTitle": "Deloitte Iowa Efficiency Transformation",
  "authorId": "proposals",
  "authorName": "Deloitte",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "portrait",
  "aspectRatio": 0.773,
  "pageNumber": 94,
  "pageCount": 185,
  "prevPage": 93,
  "nextPage": 95,
  "slideType": "appendix_methodology",
  "function": "present_framework",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 1,
  "notes": "The slide appears to be a continuation of a larger methodology or diagnostic section, referencing a specific source for university spend management.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "bullet_list",
    "paragraph",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.9,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ca6c71c657c8/94",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ca6c71c657c8",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ca6c71c657c8.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-ca6c71c657c8#slide-94",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Effective execution of the source-to-pay process lifecycle is crucial, since for most universities more than 40% of the operating budget consists of expenditures to external suppliers.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-fef5-761e-80b6-cfbe98fb3635",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.45
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Establish and enforce single location for accounts receivables to improve collections\nStandardize gift award lifecycle and process\nAccounts receivable processing performed by a central shared-services organization\nBudget process driven by top-down targets derived from strategy, resources of the firm, and expectations of stakeholders such as capital markets",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1a5c34a3-c3bc-4b7c-a436-f7a0ea79b233",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.09
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Sponsored Awards data (e.g., grant expenditures)\nPayroll data",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6e0361e7-fa03-4283-a0b8-5acc9f39a1a3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.12,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.29
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Efficiency Measures (e.g. close cycle for monthly and fiscal year close)\nEffectiveness Measures (e.g. Expense Process Cycle Time, etc.)\nNumber of Accounts Payable (AP) staff per transactions processed\nShare of invoices paid by ACH/EFT as compared to check\nShare of invoices processed electronically",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "71a0ae58-c76c-4ec8-9a7f-a0994955a727",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.17
      },
      "kind": "list",
      "text": "Integrated Performance Management (IPM) review of the planning, budgeting & forecasting process\nReview of Budgeting funding model\nAssessment of Risk Management Function",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "bullet",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "aa558607-081a-44d6-9bdc-8f5d71c55ef6",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "operating budget: 40%",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-fef5-761e-80b6-d35518a4d541",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.18,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.59
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "The sourcing and procurement function is responsible for activities related to the management of expenditures with external suppliers of goods and services. The activities performed can be defined within the context of what is commonly referred to as the source-to-pay process lifecycle, where goods and services are sourced (Supplier Identification and Contracting--Sourcing) orders are placed for the goods and services (Purchase Order Processing) and suppliers are paid (Invoice Processing). Effective execution of the source-to-pay process lifecycle is crucial, since for most universities more than 40% of the operating budget consists of expenditures to external suppliers. For that reason many of the institutional and state-system efficiency audits making headlines in higher education concur that reducing external spend is the largest opportunity for administrative savings.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "68bf7933-46e6-40d0-b50c-c27f30e21d14",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.7,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.87
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "5 University Business Executive Roundtable. Disciplining University Spend. Strategies and Best Practices for Achieving Savings from On-Contract Purchasing. 2009 The Advisory Board Company",
      "attrs": {
        "numbered": true
      },
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "f4051628-107a-4da5-8f78-79f4d7308e47",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Potential Areas of Analysis",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1530bdf1-a5a8-434c-9747-01c0505484ee",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.77
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Sample Savings Hypotheses:",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "20b35342-65b1-4032-bf28-04d64258c7cf",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.42
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Leading Improvement Opportunity Examples",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "961c8f14-f616-4e0a-ba7d-23666d637314",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.56
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Sourcing and Procurement",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b2d77845-43e8-410d-9a22-65be5bc7414c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.2,
        "x": 0.15,
        "y": 0.26
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Sample Benchmarks",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c3c34c4b-76a6-4fe5-b159-e2aa064301ca",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "List presentation",
      "slug": "list-presentation",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "3cefbf38-9804-44c4-a678-b0a934745d83",
      "evidence": "The slide contains a list/bullet component with several items, indicating a list presentation.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 120,
      "from": 81,
      "beatId": "4d51b6b6-1d18-4415-94f1-10d34a076597",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Impact & Next Steps",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-impact-next-steps",
      "evidence": "The document provides a detailed plan for implementation and potential impact.",
      "position": 3,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Resolution",
      "parentBeatSlug": "resolution"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}