{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-8a6267adb76a",
  "docSlug": "699bdad2bc65ccd6",
  "documentTitle": "The Future of Procurement: Why is Technology Lagging Behind?",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "SirionLabs",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 16,
  "pageCount": 36,
  "prevPage": 15,
  "nextPage": 17,
  "slideType": "market_landscape",
  "function": "present_framework",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a matrix-like layout to segment vendors by functional area and solution type.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "logo_grid"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 0.95,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-8a6267adb76a/16",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-8a6267adb76a",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-8a6267adb76a.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-8a6267adb76a#slide-16",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.14,
        "x": 0.84,
        "y": 0.23
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "Non-exhaustive",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "8a166a7f-bc9f-4817-812e-ff5a0b6cbdab",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "The traditional procurement technology vendor landscape does not effectively support automation, innovation, and analytics",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-f385-7630-9b30-e63aac6aebe4",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.12,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.95
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "Source: A.T. Kearney",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1cffcf45-df6d-43ca-9ad6-0fa4b0adce56",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Vendor landscape matrix with columns: Spend Analytics, eSourcing, Contract Mgmt, Supplier Info. Mgmt, Procure to Pay, Supplier Perf. Mgmt, Knowledge Mgmt.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "a60a367e-9f34-4fb2-8611-cf628a7950a3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.96,
        "x": 0.02,
        "y": 0.08
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "The traditional procurement technology vendor landscape does not effectively support automation, innovation, and analytics",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "45389398-5d9c-4995-b3f3-e1527c3a2a3d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "NxN matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-nxn",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "bf6ae1c1-5d77-40f8-8f98-2b586f020f2d",
      "evidence": "table/data: Vendor landscape matrix with columns: Spend Analytics, eSourcing, Contract Mgmt, Supplier Info. Mgmt, Procure to Pay, Supplier Perf. Mgmt, Knowledge Mgmt.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "market-segmentation-pyramid",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "5b0e51b1-7663-4e06-8146-e2ee86446e97",
      "evidence": "Categorization of vendors into Suite vs Functional specialists",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 16,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "b807f651-fa15-4d5e-a5ac-3a898c8a4137",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "The deck presents the problem statement, industry trends, and market landscape.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.9,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 16,
      "from": 6,
      "name": "Cost Of Inaction",
      "slug": "27-cost-of-inaction",
      "bestFor": "Urgent budget requests, compliance, risk mitigation",
      "matchId": "7e3c6b8a-94ab-46b2-be05-21a521d90162",
      "evidence": "The deck presents the problem statement and market landscape, emphasizing the need for change.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "Highlight the costs of inaction in procurement",
      "structure": "The Status Quo -> The Hidden Costs Accumulating -> The Future State of Inaction -> The Tipping Point",
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "description": "Quantify what happens if the audience does nothing"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}