{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-6b66cbcf2b92",
  "docSlug": "e02b05e652e057ac",
  "documentTitle": "Scalar calibration For Life insurance business",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "Oliver Wyman",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.778,
  "pageNumber": 9,
  "pageCount": 43,
  "prevPage": 8,
  "nextPage": 10,
  "slideType": "data_table",
  "function": "analyze_data",
  "density": "overcrowded",
  "nDataPoints": 75,
  "notes": "The table shows the number of companies in specific solvency buckets (<200%, 200-400%, >400%) for different intervention levels (200% vs 300% ACL) over a 5-year period.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "data_table",
    "callout_box",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-6b66cbcf2b92/9",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-6b66cbcf2b92",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-6b66cbcf2b92.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-6b66cbcf2b92#slide-9",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.82,
        "y": 0.6
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "For Japan, company solvency ratios are comparatively more concentrated. Almost all companies are above a 200% solvency ratio, regardless of where the US intervention level is set.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4226e642-70c5-4049-a6ee-984116007b25",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.2,
        "w": 0.15,
        "x": 0.82,
        "y": 0.28
      },
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "There is a wide dispersion of solvency ratios for EMEA companies. At a 300% ACL intervention level, about 20% of companies are below 200% solvency ratio.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "6e971d0f-fe23-486c-a9b8-66ed1e21c19c",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "At a 300% ACL intervention level, about 20% of companies are below 200% solvency ratio.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-f95b-7408-8fbf-e0382d6f15d9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "Solvency ratio",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-f95b-7408-8fbf-e667a31c43ae",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.92
      },
      "kind": "source-note",
      "text": "1. 50 largest US and EMEA companies (by assets) included as part of this exercise. Full scope of 22 Japanese companies included",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b4a059d2-0247-4311-b018-f4e4771a6953",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "subtitle",
      "text": "Company distribution of scaled solvency ratios (capital weighted, 3-year time series) – EMEA & Japan",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "d6bb6916-d326-4a38-b180-08436cc22ccd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.75,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Table showing company counts by regime, intervention level, solvency ratio, and year.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "2965c109-7b7a-46dc-82ac-3edd3016a886",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.04,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.03,
        "y": 0.05
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "DESIGN DECISIONS: INTERVENTION THRESHOLD FOR US MARKET",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "1ed3cfe7-f2e6-4288-81be-c0360ab2ce1d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 23,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "be00beba-88e6-419c-aec4-bbdcc387eecd",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Evidence & Proof",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-evidence-proof",
      "evidence": "The document provides detailed data collection and analysis, as well as design decisions and methodology.",
      "position": 2,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Evidence",
      "parentBeatSlug": "evidence"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [
    {
      "to": 43,
      "from": 4,
      "name": "Golden Circle",
      "slug": "11-golden-circle",
      "bestFor": "Visionary leadership, brand positioning, mission statements",
      "matchId": "ce650a06-9055-4eba-8023-01c95c754338",
      "evidence": "The document follows a structured approach, starting with an executive summary, followed by design decisions, data collection, and implementation plans.",
      "position": 0,
      "objective": "To provide a comprehensive overview of the proposed scalar calibration",
      "structure": "The Why (Belief) -> The How (Process) -> The What (Result)",
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "description": "Invert the typical pitch by starting with why you exist, rather than what you do"
    },
    {
      "to": 23,
      "from": 5,
      "name": "Mece Breakdown",
      "slug": "40-mece-breakdown",
      "bestFor": "Problem structuring, ensuring completeness, strategic analysis",
      "matchId": "1a37fc1b-8a8b-4f9b-83c4-36cd3dafe9ed",
      "evidence": "The document provides a detailed breakdown of the data collection and analysis.",
      "position": 1,
      "objective": "To provide detailed data collection and analysis",
      "structure": "The Whole -> Category A (distinct) -> Category B (distinct) -> Category C (distinct) -> Complete Coverage",
      "confidence": 0.7,
      "description": "Divide a complex topic into mutually exclusive, collectively exhaustive categories"
    }
  ],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}