{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-61b88342a372",
  "docSlug": "03095094c078fb47",
  "documentTitle": "Review of efficiency of the operation of the federal courts",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "PwC",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.333,
  "pageNumber": 95,
  "pageCount": 105,
  "prevPage": 94,
  "nextPage": 96,
  "slideType": "appendix_data",
  "function": "quantify_impact",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 12,
  "notes": "The slide uses a table structure to map 'Indicative value' categories to detailed methodological descriptions.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "comparison_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-61b88342a372/95",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-61b88342a372",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-61b88342a372.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-61b88342a372#slide-95",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.08,
        "w": 0.3,
        "x": 0.65,
        "y": 0.02
      },
      "kind": "image",
      "text": "Header icons",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "icon-grid",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "51379bcd-75ee-4a42-93db-f9178d4e7648",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "metric",
      "text": "judicial FTE capacity: 520",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "primary",
      "toolName": "Quantification",
      "toolSlug": "quantification",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-edaa-73b9-9031-21a39df6f9a0",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.88
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "Note: Some values presented in this table have been rounded for assessment purposes. 1: Assuming Appeal Division judicial FTE of 8, out of total FCoA judicial FTE of 31 (2016-17).",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "468e0955-78c5-42b6-b71d-10974e68913e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.65,
        "w": 0.9,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.23
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Table containing methodology for Single judge appeals and Cross-division utilisation",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "24b8e9a6-1fba-4fd4-b6ce-4d3af65e96db",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.4,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.15
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "How the opportunities were quantified",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "action-title",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "812b060e-d5ac-4e5e-b0f3-50e63f98aba3",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.05,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.05,
        "y": 0.1
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Appeals management (Opportunities 7 to 9)",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "4a19ea99-eb1d-423f-97cb-a4d82e1ae27e",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "Table data",
      "slug": "table-data",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "ba1327d0-927a-4ebd-84c6-91b1e834513a",
      "evidence": "The slide contains a table with data on methodology for 'Single judge appeals and Cross-division utilisation'.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}