{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f",
  "docSlug": "091122f6e046fa86",
  "documentTitle": "Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "L.E.K.",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 9,
  "pageCount": 170,
  "prevPage": 8,
  "nextPage": 10,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "balanced",
  "nDataPoints": 104,
  "notes": "The table uses a qualitative scoring system (++, +, 0, -, --) to evaluate options.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "headline_text",
    "data_table",
    "footnote"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f/9",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f#slide-9",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": null,
      "kind": "callout",
      "text": "High level summary of option evaluation – for implementation in the short term",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": "Visual emphasis",
      "toolSlug": "visual-emphasis",
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "019dd951-edab-7238-a54b-1b1d2cb20e11",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.06,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.88
      },
      "kind": "paragraph",
      "text": "This table is a high level summary of the option evaluation process. Individual scores should be treated as indicative and may vary across regions, over time or depending on the package of options",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "paragraph",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "75329baa-8f23-4b15-badc-bc44703752bd",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.6,
        "w": 0.8,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.27
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Evaluation matrix of 8 options across 13 criteria",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "b9790f2d-94c1-445a-9653-431daabb42d9",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.6,
        "x": 0.1,
        "y": 0.22
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "High level summary of option evaluation – for implementation in the short term",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "c112abaf-ddf6-4a20-b1b4-8dc7889bbdde",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [
    {
      "name": "2x2 matrix",
      "slug": "matrix-2x2",
      "agent": null,
      "layer": "slide",
      "matchId": "b0f68303-66a6-437a-9df8-89c321030225",
      "evidence": "The table could be interpreted as a 2x2 matrix with criteria on one axis and options on the other.",
      "confidence": 0.7
    }
  ],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "evidence-matrix",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "8728d47e-63d1-4092-8e79-365ab987c09e",
      "evidence": "The slide presents a structured comparison of options against criteria using a qualitative scoring system.",
      "confidence": 0.9
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [
    {
      "to": 20,
      "from": 6,
      "beatId": "8a384828-5b90-4e3f-82ce-03a3f366ff67",
      "arcName": "The Consultant's Gambit",
      "arcSlug": "consultants-gambit",
      "beatName": "Problem & Complication",
      "beatSlug": "consultants-gambit-problem-complication",
      "evidence": "The document analyzes the challenges in aligning incentives between Network Rail and train operators.",
      "position": 1,
      "confidence": 0.8,
      "parentBeatName": "Complication",
      "parentBeatSlug": "complication"
    }
  ],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}