{
  "docId": "019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f",
  "docSlug": "091122f6e046fa86",
  "documentTitle": "Rail industry cost and revenue sharing (2011)",
  "authorId": "misc",
  "authorName": "L.E.K.",
  "documentKindSlug": "consulting-deck",
  "documentKindLabel": "Consulting deck",
  "sourceTypeSlug": "strategy_consulting",
  "sourceTypeLabel": "Strategy consulting",
  "presentationDate": null,
  "orientation": "landscape",
  "aspectRatio": 1.414,
  "pageNumber": 83,
  "pageCount": 170,
  "prevPage": 82,
  "nextPage": 84,
  "slideType": "comparison_table",
  "function": "compare_options",
  "density": "sparse",
  "nDataPoints": 0,
  "notes": "The slide uses a scoring system of ++, +, 0, -, -- to evaluate criteria.",
  "elementsJson": [
    "data_table"
  ],
  "metadataConfidence": 1,
  "imagePath": null,
  "slideHref": "/slides/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f/83",
  "deckHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f",
  "deckJsonHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f.json",
  "deckAnchorHref": "/decks/019dd923-5de0-76bd-a165-578b9862173f#slide-83",
  "components": [
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.02,
        "w": 0.35,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.94
      },
      "kind": "disclaimer",
      "text": "ORR/ATOC/Network Rail. Rail industry cost and revenue sharing.",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": null,
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "9da6a3b2-481e-4e95-8837-7aecb3c474a2",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.74,
        "w": 0.82,
        "x": 0.09,
        "y": 0.19
      },
      "kind": "table",
      "text": "Category, Criterion, Score, Comments",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "data",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "967757ea-f3ea-4ca9-b00b-7d6ea479138d",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    },
    {
      "bbox": {
        "h": 0.03,
        "w": 0.86,
        "x": 0.07,
        "y": 0.14
      },
      "kind": "title",
      "text": "Assessment: Option 1: Symmetrical Regional EBS – based on implementation in the short term",
      "attrs": null,
      "subkind": "headline",
      "toolName": null,
      "toolSlug": null,
      "confidence": null,
      "componentId": "99909280-9833-4bfb-bb79-59e81a883449",
      "frameworkName": null,
      "frameworkSlug": null
    }
  ],
  "metrics": [],
  "tools": [],
  "frameworks": [
    {
      "name": "evidence-matrix",
      "slug": null,
      "matchId": "4ca99e7f-7d5a-46e2-81ed-102be31f4f10",
      "evidence": "The slide presents a structured evaluation of criteria against a specific option using qualitative scores.",
      "confidence": 0.8
    }
  ],
  "arcBeats": [],
  "loops": [],
  "imagePathAlt": null,
  "thumbSrc": null,
  "thumbSrcAlt": null,
  "locked": true
}